Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
4 B 62/18, 4 B 62/18 (4 C 3/19) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2019:280619B4B62.18.0 Generato dall'IA

Duty of Consideration and Priority Principle for Mutually Interfering Wind Energy Installations Subject to Different Permit Procedures

Numero d'incarto 4 B 62/18, 4 B 62/18 (4 C 3/19)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the revision appeal of the associated party under § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO, thereby overturning the lower court's dismissal and setting the provisional value in dispute for the appellate phase. The dispute concerns a conflict between two mutually interfering wind energy installations, specifically regarding whether one turbine must defer to the other's impact on turbulence, arising from a challenge to an administrative decision where one facility underwent a pre-permit procedure and the other a full licensing procedure. The decisive legal issue centers on the application of the duty of consideration and the priority principle in balancing competing wind energy projects, requiring clarification of which installation must accommodate the other's operational impacts.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Duty of Consideration and Priority Principle for Mutually Interfering Wind Energy Installations Subject to Different Permit Procedures: 1 VwGO, thereby overturning the lower court's dismissal and setting the provisional value in dispute for the appellate phase. The dispute concerns a conflict between two mutually interfering wind energy installations, specifically regarding whether one turbine must defer to the other's impact on turbulence, arising from a challenge to an administrative decision where one facility underwent a pre-permit procedure and the other a full licensing procedure. The decisive legal issue centers on the application of the duty of consideration and the priority principle in balancing competing wind energy projects, requiring clarification of which installation must accommodate the other's operational impacts.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
impugnazione di decisioni amministrative motivi di revisione energia eolica esame delle candidature valore litigioso procedura d'autorizzazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for allowing the revision appeal due to the need to clarify a significant legal question.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision procedure.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision procedure.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision procedure.
Generato dall'IA
4 B 63/18, 4 B 63/18 (4 C 4/19)
Wind energy mutual interference: obligation of consideration between competing installations and priority rule in mixed authorization proceedings
4 C 3/19
Priority principle for wind turbines: applicability of first-in-time review to conflicts between preliminary approval and final permit
7 B 12/23
Priority between competing wind energy permits and binding effect of aviation authority consent on immission control approvals
4 BN 12/12, 4 BN 12/12 (4 CN 2/12)
Admissibility of revision: standards for balancing public and private interests in wind energy concentration area planning
7 B 5.25
Wind energy permit priority and planning plan invalidity via integrated normative control reasoning

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for allowing the revision appeal due to the need to clarify a significant legal question.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision procedure.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision procedure.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision procedure.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Rücksichtnahmegebot bei zwei sich gegenseitig beeinträchtigenden Windenergieanlagen

[GRUENDE]

Auf die Beschwerde der Beigeladenen wird die Revision nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zugelassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, welche von zwei sich gegenseitig beeinträchtigenden Windenergieanlagen im Hinblick auf Turbulenzen auf die jeweils andere Rücksicht nehmen muss, insbesondere ob und ggf. nach welchen Maßgaben der Grundsatz der Priorität Anwendung findet, wenn für die eine Anlage ein Verfahren zum Erlass eines Vorbescheides und für die andere ein Genehmigungsverfahren durchgeführt wird.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.