Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
4 B 63/18, 4 B 63/18 (4 C 4/19) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2019:280619B4B63.18.0 Generato dall'IA

Wind energy mutual interference: obligation of consideration between competing installations and priority rule in mixed authorization proceedings

Numero d'incarto 4 B 63/18, 4 B 63/18 (4 C 4/19)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the appeal (Revision) filed by the co-defendant, ordering that the matter proceed to full appellate review. The dispute concerns a planning and environmental law conflict between two wind energy installations that mutually interfere with each other through wind turbulence, specifically challenging the regulatory measures and the applic of the "consideration" (Rücksichtnahme) principle in this context. The court granted leave to appeal under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, identifying a significant legal question regarding which installation must yield to the other and whether the principle of priority applies when one facility is subject to a prior authorization procedure while the other is undergoing a general licensing procedure. The decision also provisionally fixed the value in dispute for the appeal proceedings based on the relevant cost calculation provisions of the Courts' Fees and Costs Act.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Wind energy mutual interference: obligation of consideration between competing installations and priority rule in mixed authorization proceedings: The dispute concerns a planning and environmental law conflict between two wind energy installations that mutually interfere with each other through wind turbulence, specifically challenging the regulatory measures and the applic of the "consideration" (Rücksichtnahme) principle in this context. The court granted leave to appeal under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, identifying a significant legal question regarding which installation must yield to the other and whether the principle of priority applies when one facility is subject to a prior authorization procedure while the other is undergoing a general licensing procedure. The decision also provisionally fixed the value in dispute for the appeal proceedings based on the relevant cost calculation provisions of the Courts' Fees and Costs Act.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
energia eolica norma di conflitto oggetto della lite diritto delle obbligazioni misure sull’energia procedura di pianificazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for the verdict, serving as the legal basis for admitting the appeal (Revision) due to fundamental significance of the case.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Provisions applied to fix the provisional value in dispute for the appeal proceedings.
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for the verdict, serving as the legal basis for admitting the appeal (Revision) due to fundamental significance of the case.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Provisions applied to fix the provisional value in dispute for the appeal proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Rücksichtnahmegebot bei zwei sich gegenseitig beeinträchtigenden Windenergieanlagen

[GRUENDE]

Auf die Beschwerde der Beigeladenen wird die Revision nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zugelassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, welche von zwei sich gegenseitig beeinträchtigenden Windenergieanlagen im Hinblick auf Turbulenzen auf die jeweils andere Rücksicht nehmen muss, insbesondere ob und ggf. nach welchen Maßgaben der Grundsatz der Priorität Anwendung findet, wenn für die eine Anlage ein Verfahren zum Erlass eines Vorbescheides und für die andere ein Genehmigungsverfahren durchgeführt wird.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.