Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
4 BN 20/19, 4 BN 20/19 (4 CN 3/19) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2019:080419B4BN20.19.0 Generato dall'IA

Norm control admissibility of zoning plan objections filed before statutory repeal of § 47 Abs. 2a VwGO

Numero d'incarto 4 BN 20/19, 4 BN 20/19 (4 CN 3/19)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court granted the applicant's leave to appeal, thereby allowing the case to proceed to the revision instance based on the significant legal question presented. The dispute concerned the admissibility of a norm control action (Normenkontrolle) challenging a statutory provision, specifically where the applicant had failed to file objections during the public exhibition of a draft zoning plan as required by § 3 Abs. 2 BauGB, and where the legal basis for admissibility (§ 47 Abs. 2a VwGO) was repealed by a 2017 amendment to the Environmental Legal Remedies Act effective June 2, 2017, after the application was filed but before the court's decision. The court identified the decisive legal issue as determining whether a norm control application filed prior to the legislative repeal is inadmissible when the reviewing court decides on the matter only after the repeal takes effect, citing the lack of uniform case law on this procedural temporal question as the basis for § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 3 Abs. 2 BauGB, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Norm control admissibility of zoning plan objections filed before statutory repeal of § 47 Abs. 2a VwGO: The dispute concerned the admissibility of a norm control action (Normenkontrolle) challenging a statutory provision, specifically where the applicant had failed to file objections during the public exhibition of a draft zoning plan as required by § 3 Abs. 2 BauGB, and where the legal basis for admissibility (§ 47 Abs. 2a VwGO) was repealed by a 2017 amendment to the Environmental Legal Remedies Act effective June 2, 2017, after the application was filed but before the court's decision. The court identified the decisive legal issue as determining whether a norm control application filed prior to the legislative repeal is inadmissible when the reviewing court decides on the matter only after the repeal takes effect, citing the lack of uniform case law on this procedural temporal question as the basis for § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
revisione del piano regolatore censure procedurali atto processuale base legale non attribuzione a una zona modifica legislativa

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for the verdict, cited as the basis for granting leave to appeal on the applicant's complaint.
§ 3 Abs. 2 BauGB
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Procedural and cost provisions cited as the basis for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
4 CN 3/19
Norm control admissibility: repeal of § 47(2a) VwGO and its retroactive effect on pending applications despite prior participation lapses
4 CN 3/10
Preclusion of objections in norm control under § 47 Abs. 2a VwGO for self-evident interests not raised during public consultation
7 BN 5/21
Norm control admissibility for unenacted bylaw drafts triggering statutory provisional building bans
4 BN 5/15, 4 BN 5/15 (4 CN 4/15)
Preclusion under § 47 Abs. 2 VwGO for objections based on facts arising after public display of a zoning plan
4 BN 18/14
Standing in norm control against zoning plans based on procedural promulgation during a citizens' initiative; interpretation of "complete judgment" for appeal deadlines

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for the verdict, cited as the basis for granting leave to appeal on the applicant's complaint.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Procedural and cost provisions cited as the basis for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Unzulässigkeit einer Normenkontrolle nach Rechtsänderung; Präklusion

[GRUENDE]

Auf die Beschwerde des Antragstellers wird die Revision nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zugelassen. Die Rechtssache kann voraussichtlich zur Klärung der in der obergerichtlichen Rechtsprechung umstrittenen Frage beitragen, ob der Normenkontrollantrag eines Antragstellers, der im Rahmen der öffentlichen Auslegung des Entwurfs eines Bebauungsplans nach § 3 Abs. 2 BauGB keine Einwendungen geltend gemacht hat, nach der durch Art. 5 des Gesetzes zur Anpassung des Umwelt-Rechtsbehelfsgesetzes und anderer Vorschriften an europa- und völkerrechtliche Vorgaben vom 29. Mai 2017 (BGBl. I S. 1298) mit Wirkung zum 2. Juni 2017 aufgehobenen Vorschrift des § 47 Abs. 2a VwGO unzulässig ist, wenn der Normenkontrollantrag vor der Rechtsänderung gestellt wurde, das Normenkontrollgericht aber erst nach der Rechtsänderung über den Normenkontrollantrag entscheidet.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.