Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
5 B 2/19 D, 5 B 2/19 D (5 C 3/19 D) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2019:280219B5B2.19D0 Generato dall'IA

Rebuttal of the presumption of intangible disadvantage under § 198 Abs. 2 Satz 1 GVG through unlawful conduct

Numero d'incarto 5 B 2/19 D, 5 B 2/19 D (5 C 3/19 D)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Administrative Court of the Federal Republic of Germany (BVerwG) ordered the admission of the plaintiff's appeal, allowing the case to proceed on the merits as the plaintiff prevailed on the procedural threshold. The dispute concerned a complaint against the lower court's refusal to admit the appeal to the higher administrative court, specifically involving a challenge to a decision where the presumption of intangible disadvantage was at issue. The decisive legal basis was § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, under which the court found the matter to be of fundamental significance, necessitating clarification on whether and under what conditions the presumption of intangible disadvantage under § 198 Abs. 2 Satz 1 GVG can be rebutted by unlawful conduct.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Rebuttal of the presumption of intangible disadvantage under § 198 Abs. 2 Satz 1 GVG through unlawful conduct: Die Beschwerde des Klägers ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
fondamento della responsabilità presunzione impugnazione di decisioni amministrative oggetto della lite motivi che possono invocarsi decisioni incidentali

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.
Generato dall'IA
5 C 3/19 D
Rebuttal of presumed non-pecuniary harm under § 198 GVG due to illegal acquisition of benefits during excessive proceedings
B 10 ÜG 15/19 B
Admissibility of non-admission complaint challenging rebuttal of presumed disadvantage due to missing process counsel accounting in compensation for excessive duration of proceedings
IV ZB 2/26
Inadmissibility of appeal for failure to concretely rebut lower court’s finding on lack of pre-litigation demand individualization
1 B 17.25
Unstatthafte Berufung in Asylsachen: Unzulässigkeit der Nichtzulassungsbeschwerde mangels Darlegung der Entscheidungserheblichkeit
2 B 34/14, 2 B 34/14, 2 PKH 1/14
Beamtenrechtliche Disziplinarverhandlung: Verhandlungsunfähigkeit nach eigenmächtiger Sitzungsaufhebung und Substantiierungsanforderungen an Gehörsverletzungen

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Widerlegung der Vermutung eines immateriellen Nachteils im Sinne von § 198 Abs. 2 Satz 1 GVG durch rechtswidriges Verhalten

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Klägers ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, ob und unter welchen Voraussetzungen die Vermutung eines immateriellen Nachteils im Sinne von § 198 Abs. 2 Satz 1 GVG durch rechtswidriges Verhalten widerlegt wird.