Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
5 PB 17/18, 5 PB 17/18 (5 P 7/19) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2019:220219B5PB17.18.0 Generato dall'IA

Co-determination over external versus internal posting of vacant service positions under § 75(3) No. 14 BPersVG

Numero d'incarto 5 PB 17/18, 5 PB 17/18 (5 P 7/19)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (5th Senate) granted leave to appeal for the applicant’s legal complaint, ruling that the case raises a question of fundamental legal significance. The dispute concerns a challenge to a change in administrative practice by a department head, who switched from internally to externally advertising vacant service positions; the specific issue is whether this shift in posting method constitutes a decision subject to the joint-works-council’s co-determination rights under § 75(3) No. 14 of the Federal Personnel Representation Act (BPersVG). The Court found the complaint admissible under § 83(2) BPersVG in conjunction with § 72(2) No. 1 and § 92(1) sentence 2 of the German Labor Court Act (ArbGG), necessitating further review by the Senate to clarify the scope of the co-determination statute regarding the external vs. internal distinction in job advertising.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG, § 83 Abs. 2 BPersVG, § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG; Co-determination over external versus internal posting of vacant service positions under § 75(3) No. 14 BPersVG: The dispute concerns a challenge to a change in administrative practice by a department head, who switched from internally to externally advertising vacant service positions; the specific issue is whether this shift in posting method constitutes a decision subject to the joint-works-council’s co-determination rights under § 75(3) No. 14 of the Federal Personnel Representation Act (BPersVG). The Court found the complaint admissible under § 83(2) BPersVG in conjunction with § 72(2) No. 1 and § 92(1) sentence 2 of the German Labor Court Act (ArbGG), necessitating further review by the Senate to clarify the scope of the co-determination statute regarding the external vs. internal distinction in job advertising.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
conversione del posto di lavoro impugnazione di decisioni amministrative professioni amministrative rappresentanza legale diritti costituzionali specifici motivo di revisione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG
Procedural rule applied via reference for the formal requirements of the legal complaint.
§ 83 Abs. 2 BPersVG
Main ground for granting leave to appeal due to a question of fundamental legal significance.
§ 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG
Procedural rule applied via reference for the requirements of legal complaint admission.
Generato dall'IA
5 P 3/22
External job advertisement as co-determination measure and scope of internal hiring priority in service agreements
6 PB 1/12
Staff council co-determination over waiver of public civil service vacancy announcements under § 75 Abs. 3 Nr. 14 BPersVG
5 P 7/19
Service-level co-determination scope: Exclusion of job advertisement publication modalities and candidate pool expansion from § 75(3)(14) BPersVG
6 P 10/09
Co-determination over waiver of public service post tender under § 75(3) No. 14 BPersVG
6 PB 36/13
Staff council co-determination to forgo job postings and recharacterization of fundamental legal challenge as divergence appeal

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 83 Abs. 2 BPersVG

Main ground for granting leave to appeal due to a question of fundamental legal significance.

§ 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG

Procedural rule applied via reference for the requirements of legal complaint admission.

§ 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG

Procedural rule applied via reference for the formal requirements of the legal complaint.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Zulassung der Rechtsbeschwerde; Wechsel von interner zu externer Ausschreibung von Dienstposten

[GRUENDE]

Die Rechtsbeschwerde des Antragstellers ist gemäß § 83 Abs. 2 BPersVG i.V.m. § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG wegen einer entscheidungserheblichen Rechtsfrage von grundsätzlicher Bedeutung zuzulassen.

Die vorliegende Rechtssache kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, ob der Mitbestimmungstatbestand des § 75 Abs. 3 Nr. 14 BPersVG auch erfüllt ist, wenn der Dienststellenleiter seine Verwaltungspraxis, zu besetzende Dienstposten zunächst intern auszuschreiben, ändert und Dienstposten, die besetzt werden sollen, extern ausschreibt.