Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
8 B 6/18, 8 B 6/18 (8 C 14/18) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2018:201218B8B6.18.0 Generato dall'IA

Isolated challengeability and revocability of a gambling license condition excluding minors despite a defect affecting the entire administrative act

Numero d'incarto 8 B 6/18, 8 B 6/18 (8 C 14/18)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) allowed the appeal against the admission of revision, finding the legal issue to be of fundamental significance, thereby permitting the appellant to proceed to the Revisionsverfahren. The dispute concerned the legality of a Nebenbestimmung (side condition) attached to a gambling law license, specifically a condition securing the exclusion of underage players, with the core question being whether such a condition is independently challengeable and susceptible to isolated cancellation. The court identified the decisive legal issues under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, focusing on whether a defect affecting the entire administrative act precludes the isolated revocation of a validly independent side condition, and clarified the applicable procedural norms for litigation costs under § 47, § 52, and § 63 GKG.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Isolated challengeability and revocability of a gambling license condition excluding minors despite a defect affecting the entire administrative act: The dispute concerned the legality of a Nebenbestimmung (side condition) attached to a gambling law license, specifically a condition securing the exclusion of underage players, with the core question being whether such a condition is independently challengeable and susceptible to isolated cancellation. The court identified the decisive legal issues under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, focusing on whether a defect affecting the entire administrative act precludes the isolated revocation of a validly independent side condition, and clarified the applicable procedural norms for litigation costs under § 47, § 52, and § 63 GKG.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
questioni processuali spese amministrative aspetti giuridici revoca della decisione amministrativa giuoco e scommessa atti impugnabili

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for the verdict, justifying the allowance of the appeal on the basis of fundamental significance.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Basis for the determination of the value of the dispute and associated costs.
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for the verdict, justifying the allowance of the appeal on the basis of fundamental significance.

§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for the determination of the value of the dispute and associated costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; glücksspielrechtliche Erlaubnis; Nebenbestimmung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde hat Erfolg. Die Rechtssache hat grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne von § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO.

Im Revisionsverfahren ist voraussichtlich die sinngemäß aufgeworfene Frage zu klären, ob eine der glücksspielrechtlichen Erlaubnis beigefügte Nebenbestimmung zur Sicherung des Ausschlusses minderjähriger Spieler isoliert anfechtbar und gegebenenfalls isoliert aufhebbar ist.

Darüber hinaus kann das Verfahren Gelegenheit geben zu klären, ob eine isoliert anzufechtende Nebenbestimmung isoliert aufgehoben werden darf, wenn der Mangel, dessentwegen sie rechtswidrig ist, nicht nur die Nebenbestimmung, sondern den gesamten Verwaltungsakt erfasst.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.