Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 B 21/18, 2 B 21/18 (2 C 37/18) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2018:221118B2B21.18.0 Generato dall'IA

Liability of recognized conscientious objectors for reimbursement of specialized military training costs following early termination of service

Numero d'incarto 2 B 21/18, 2 B 21/18 (2 C 37/18)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court granted the plaintiff's complaint and permitted an appeal to the revising instance, finding the appeal justified due to the fundamental significance of the legal question involved. The dispute concerns the reimbursement of training costs to the Federal Armed Forces by a recognized conscientious objector whose professional soldier service was terminated early, specifically regarding the extent to which such individuals are liable for costs associated with specialized training as an air traffic control officer. The decision relies on Section 132(2) No. 1 of the Administrative Court Procedure Act (VwGO) to allow the revising court to further clarify the scope of liability for training cost recovery under the Federal Pay Structure Act (SG) in cases involving early termination of service for recognized conscientious objectors.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG; Liability of recognized conscientious objectors for reimbursement of specialized military training costs following early termination of service: The dispute concerns the reimbursement of training costs to the Federal Armed Forces by a recognized conscientious objector whose professional soldier service was terminated early, specifically regarding the extent to which such individuals are liable for costs associated with specialized training as an air traffic control officer. The decision relies on Section 132(2) No. 1 of the Administrative Court Procedure Act (VwGO) to allow the revising court to further clarify the scope of liability for training cost recovery under the Federal Pay Structure Act (SG) in cases involving early termination of service for recognized conscientious objectors.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
servizio militare rimborso delle spese cessazione definitiva dal servizio formazione sul posto di lavoro responsabilità dell'assicurazione militare diritto disciplinare militare

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for the verdict, explicitly cited to justify the admission of the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.
§ 52 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG
3 und § 52 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BVerwGE 158, 364
Generato dall'IA
2 B 22/18, 2 B 22/18 (2 C 38/18)
Reimbursement of Bundeswehr training costs: liability of recognized conscientious objectors after premature termination of professional soldier service
2 C 37/18
Reimbursement of military training costs by conscientious objector: limiting liability to retained economic advantage to protect freedom of conscience
2 B 44/18
Reimbursement of military training costs following conscientious objection: scope of advantage recapture and exclusion of service credit deduction
2 C 38/18
Recovery of military training costs from a conscientious objector: limitation to the realized professional benefit
2 B 9/23
Reimbursement of military training costs governed by soldier status at time of discharge rather than training

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for the verdict, explicitly cited to justify the admission of the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Erstattung von Ausbildungskosten der Bundeswehr; Zulassung der Revision

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Klägers ist begründet. Die Revision wird wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) zugelassen.

Das Revisionsverfahren kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht im Anschluss an die bereits vorliegende Rechtsprechung (vgl. insbesondere BVerwG, Beschluss vom 14. Mai 2014 - 2 B 96.13 - Buchholz 449 § 46 SG Nr. 22 und Urteile vom 28. Oktober 2015 - 2 C 40.13 - Buchholz 449 § 56 SG Nr. 4 sowie vom 12. April 2017 - 2 C 16.16 - BVerwGE 158, 364) Gelegenheit zur weiteren Klärung der Frage geben, in welchem Umfang anerkannte Kriegsdienstverweigerer nach vorzeitiger Beendigung des Berufssoldatenverhältnisses zur Erstattung von Ausbildungskosten (hier: Fachausbildung zum Flugsicherungskontrolloffizier) herangezogen werden dürfen.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG. Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 63 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und § 52 Abs. 3 Satz 1 GKG.