Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
3 B 14/17, 3 PKH 2/17 (3 C 15/18), 3 B 14/17, 3 PKH 2/17 (3 C 15/18) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2018:240718B3B14.17.0 Generato dall'IA

Eligibility for rehabilitation under the Administrative Rehabilitation Act for health damages resulting from an unlawful border crossing from the GDR

Numero d'incarto 3 B 14/17, 3 PKH 2/17 (3 C 15/18), 3 B 14/17, 3 PKH 2/17 (3 C 15/18)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court granted legal aid to the plaintiff and ordered the lower administrative court to remit the case for a full revision hearing, finding that the appeal against the denial of revision had sufficient prospect of success. The dispute centers on a claim for rehabilitation benefits under German law for health damages allegedly suffered during an unlawful border crossing from the former German Democratic Republic to the Federal Republic, specifically whether successful evasion of border security measures causing traumatic injury qualifies for compensation. The decisive legal basis is the Administrative Rehabilitation Act (§§ 1, 3), with the court determining that the issue of whether such health-damaging illegal border crossings warrant rehabilitation has fundamental significance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, thereby necessitating a final ruling by the senate.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 166 Abs. 1 Satz 1 VwGO, § 121 Abs. 1 ZPO, § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Eligibility for rehabilitation under the Administrative Rehabilitation Act for health damages resulting from an unlawful border crossing from the GDR: The dispute centers on a claim for rehabilitation benefits under German law for health damages allegedly suffered during an unlawful border crossing from the former German Democratic Republic to the Federal Republic, specifically whether successful evasion of border security measures causing traumatic injury qualifies for compensation. The decisive legal basis is the Administrative Rehabilitation Act (§§ 1, 3), with the court determining that the issue of whether such health-damaging illegal border crossings warrant rehabilitation has fundamental significance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, thereby necessitating a final ruling by the senate.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
successo d'integrazione gratuito patrocinio revisione di una decisione provvedimento d'integrazione nell'assicurazione sociale allontanamento nonostante motivi di salute legalità del fermo

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 166 Abs. 1 Satz 1 VwGO
Dem Kläger ist für das Verfahren vor dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Prozesskostenhilfe zu bewilligen und sein Prozessbevollmächtigter beizuordnen (§ 166 Abs. 1 Satz 1 VwGO i.V.m.
§ 121 Abs. 1 ZPO
1 Satz 1, § 121 Abs. 1 ZPO).
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for the verdict, cited in the dispositive order to justify the admission of the revision based on fundamental significance.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Costs provision cited in the dispositive order to establish the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
8 C 1/19
Administrative rehabilitation for GDR border security measures as individual sovereign acts under § 1 Abs. 5 VwRehaG
3 B 39/15
Rehabilitation eligibility of GDR border troop demotion: gross disparity and rule-of-law incompatibility under the VwRehaG
8 B 22/21, 8 B 22/21 (8 C 15/21)
Scope of rehabilitation for individual state reprisals in the GDR system under the VwRehaG
8 C 6/22
Applicability of administrative rehabilitation to GDR adoptions and finding of rule-of-law violation despite exhaustive validity transition rules
3 B 11/10
Vocational Rehabilitation: Denial of Compensation for Career Access Barriers as Non-Compensable "Upward Damages"

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for the verdict, cited in the dispositive order to justify the admission of the revision based on fundamental significance.

§ 166 Abs. 1 Satz 1 VwGO i.V.m. § 114 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 119 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 121 Abs. 1 ZPO

Procedural rule cited in the dispositive order to grant legal aid and assign a court-appointed attorney.

§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Costs provision cited in the dispositive order to establish the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Rehabilitierung wegen Gesundheitsschädigung infolge DDR-Flucht

[GRUENDE]

Dem Kläger ist für das Verfahren vor dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Prozesskostenhilfe zu bewilligen und sein Prozessbevollmächtigter beizuordnen (§ 166 Abs. 1 Satz 1 VwGO i.V.m. § 114 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 119 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 121 Abs. 1 ZPO). Die Beschwerde gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem angefochtenen Urteil des Verwaltungsgerichts hat, wie den nachstehenden Gründen zu entnehmen ist, hinreichende Aussicht auf Erfolg. Der Kläger kann die Kosten der Prozessführung nach seinen glaubhaft gemachten persönlichen und wirtschaftlichen Verhältnissen nicht aufbringen.

Die Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Sache hat grundsätzliche Bedeutung (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Das Revisionsverfahren wird dem Senat voraussichtlich Gelegenheit geben, die Frage zu klären, ob ein DDR-Bürger gemäß § 1 Abs. 1 und 2, § 3 des Verwaltungsrechtlichen Rehabilitierungsgesetzes zu rehabilitieren sein kann, wenn er bei einem nach dem Recht der DDR ungesetzlichen Grenzübertritt die Grenzsicherungsanlagen erfolgreich überwunden hat, hierdurch aber möglicherweise traumatisiert und im Ergebnis gesundheitlich geschädigt wurde.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.