Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
4 BN 38/17, 4 BN 38/17 (4 CN 3/18) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2018:110618B4BN38.17.0 Generato dall'IA

Scope of invalidity of a land use plan featuring concentration area planning under § 35 Abs. 3 Sentence 3 BauGB in norm control proceedings

Numero d'incarto 4 BN 38/17, 4 BN 38/17 (4 CN 3/18)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted the defendant's complaint and admitted an appeal on points of law under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, effectively allowing the case to proceed to a higher instance for review. The dispute concerned a norm control action challenging a land use plan, specifically a concentration area planning measure (*Konzentrationsflächenplanung*) that excludes private building rights pursuant to § 35 Abs. 3 Satz 3 BauGB. The court determined that the case presents a significant opportunity to clarify the scope of declaring a land use plan invalid in such contexts, referencing prior case law on this specific legal issue. The interim amount in dispute for the appeal proceedings was set based on §§ 47, 52, and 63 GKG.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 35 Abs. 3 Satz 3 BauGB, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Scope of invalidity of a land use plan featuring concentration area planning under § 35 Abs. 3 Sentence 3 BauGB in norm control proceedings: 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, effectively allowing the case to proceed to a higher instance for review. The dispute concerned a norm control action challenging a land use plan, specifically a concentration area planning measure (*Konzentrationsflächenplanung*) that excludes private building rights pursuant to § 35 Abs. 3 Satz 3 BauGB. The court determined that the case presents a significant opportunity to clarify the scope of declaring a land use plan invalid in such contexts, referencing prior case law on this specific legal issue. The interim amount in dispute for the appeal proceedings was set based on §§ 47, 52, and 63 GKG.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
diritto fondiario misura pianificatoria piano di costruzione potere di cognizione diritti procedurali procedura di revisione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main legal basis for admitting the appeal on points of law (Revision) in the dispositive order.
§ 35 Abs. 3 Satz 3 BauGB
Die Rechtssache bietet dem Senat voraussichtlich Gelegenheit zu klären, in welchem Umfang die Unwirksamkeit eines Flächennutzungsplans festzustellen ist, wenn sich ein Normenkontrollantrag gegen eine Konzentrationsflächenplanung mit der Ausschlusswirkung des § 35 Abs. 3 Satz 3 BauGB richtet (vgl.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Procedural basis cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appeal proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Procedural basis cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appeal proceedings.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Procedural basis cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appeal proceedings.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BVerwGE 128, 382
April 2007 - 4 CN 3.06 - BVerwGE 128, 382 und vom 31.
BVerwGE 146, 40
Januar 2013 - 4 CN 1.12 - BVerwGE 146, 40).
Generato dall'IA
4 BN 12/18, 4 BN 12/18 (4 CN 2/19)
Scope of statutory order for land use plan: limitation to exclusion effect versus invalidity of concentration planning
4 BN 2/11
Zoning plan invalidity due to indeterminate noise protection clauses and unconstitutional expropriation of private land for public use
4 BN 21/17
Antragsbefugnis in der Normenkontrolle bei bauleitplanerischer Abwägung und Flächennutzung nach § 50 BImSchG
9 C 28/14
Invalidity of zoning plan due to unamended pre-1993 land consolidation regime; no mandatory usage surcharge for commercial plots in residential zones under § 131 Abs. 3 BauGB
4 CN 6/14
Standing in norm control against regional planning objectives under § 35 Abs. 3 Satz 2 BauGB

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main legal basis for admitting the appeal on points of law (Revision) in the dispositive order.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Procedural basis cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appeal proceedings.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Procedural basis cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appeal proceedings.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Procedural basis cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appeal proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Unwirksamkeit eines Flächennutzungsplans bei Normenkontrollantrag gegen eine Konzentrationsflächenplanung

[GRUENDE]

Auf die Beschwerde der Antragsgegnerin wird die Revision nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zugelassen. Die Rechtssache bietet dem Senat voraussichtlich Gelegenheit zu klären, in welchem Umfang die Unwirksamkeit eines Flächennutzungsplans festzustellen ist, wenn sich ein Normenkontrollantrag gegen eine Konzentrationsflächenplanung mit der Ausschlusswirkung des § 35 Abs. 3 Satz 3 BauGB richtet (vgl. BVerwG, Urteile vom 26. April 2007 - 4 CN 3.06 - BVerwGE 128, 382 und vom 31. Januar 2013 - 4 CN 1.12 - BVerwGE 146, 40).

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.