Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
7 B 13/17, 7 B 13/17 (7 C 7/18) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2018:230118B7B13.17.0 Generato dall'IA

Scope of species protection considerations in site-specific environmental impact assessment pre-screening

Numero d'incarto 7 B 13/17, 7 B 13/17 (7 C 7/18)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court granted the appeals of the defendant and the intervener, admitting the revision on grounds of the case's fundamental significance, and set the value in dispute, thereby overturning the lower instance's refusal and allowing the case to proceed to the Federal Administrative Court for a decision on the merits. The dispute concerns an environmental impact assessment (EIA) pre-screening procedure for a site-specific project, where the core issue is whether and to what extent species protection interests must be considered during the preliminary assessment under the Federal EIA Act, particularly in light of the legislative modernization effective July 20, 2017. The decisive legal basis is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which mandates the admission of revision when a case involves a legal question of fundamental significance that requires clarification by the higher court.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG; Scope of species protection considerations in site-specific environmental impact assessment pre-screening: The dispute concerns an environmental impact assessment (EIA) pre-screening procedure for a site-specific project, where the core issue is whether and to what extent species protection interests must be considered during the preliminary assessment under the Federal EIA Act, particularly in light of the legislative modernization effective July 20, 2017. The decisive legal basis is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which mandates the admission of revision when a case involves a legal question of fundamental significance that requires clarification by the higher court.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
esame di impatto ambientale protezione dell'ambiente estensione della protezione decisione pregiudiziale motivi di revisione autorizzazione in materia di protezione della natura

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question concerning species protection in EIA pre-screening.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Die Festsetzung des Streitwerts beruht für das Beschwerdeverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Provisions used to determine the value in dispute for the appeal procedure.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Provisions used to determine the value in dispute for the revision procedure.
Generato dall'IA
7 B 11/17, 7 B 11/17 (7 C 5/18)
Inclusion of species protection interests in site-specific preliminary environmental impact assessment screenings under the EIA Act
7 B 9/17, 7 B 9/17 (7 C 3/18)
Consideration of species protection interests in site-specific preliminary impact assessment under the EIA Act
7 B 10/17, 7 B 10/17 (7 C 4/18)
Species protection in site-specific preliminary review under the Environmental Impact Assessment Act
7 B 12/17, 7 B 12/17 (7 C 6/18)
Consideration of species protection in location-based preliminary Environmental Impact Assessments
7 C 7/18
Wind farm EIA screening: exclusion of individual species protection interests from site-specific preliminary review

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question concerning species protection in EIA pre-screening.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Provisions used to determine the value in dispute for the appeal procedure.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG

Provisions used to determine the value in dispute for the revision procedure.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Berücksichtigung von Belangen des Artenschutzes bei standortbezogener Vorprüfung (UVP)

[GRUENDE]

Die zulässigen Beschwerden des Beklagten und der Beigeladenen sind begründet. Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Das Revisionsverfahren kann voraussichtlich zur Klärung der sich auch nach der durch das Inkrafttreten des Gesetzes zur Modernisierung des Rechts der Umweltverträglichkeitsprüfung vom 20. Juli 2017 (BGBl. I S. 2808) geänderten Rechtslage stellenden Frage beitragen, ob und gegebenenfalls inwieweit Belange des Artenschutzes bei der standortbezogenen Vorprüfung nach dem Umweltverträglichkeitsprüfungsgesetz zu berücksichtigen sind.

Die Festsetzung des Streitwerts beruht für das Beschwerdeverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.