Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
7 B 9/17, 7 B 9/17 (7 C 3/18) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2018:230118B7B9.17.0 Generato dall'IA

Consideration of species protection interests in site-specific preliminary impact assessment under the EIA Act

Numero d'incarto 7 B 9/17, 7 B 9/17 (7 C 3/18)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted leave to appeal in a revision proceeding, ruling that the defendant's and the joined party's appeals were well-founded. The dispute concerns the scope of a site-specific preliminary impact assessment (UVP-Vorprüfung) under the Environmental Impact Assessment Act, specifically whether and to what extent species protection interests must be considered during this screening phase. The court ordered that the case be reviewed on its merits because the question presents fundamental significance, particularly in light of the 2017 amendments to the EIA legal framework, thereby leaving the lower instance judgment subject to further judicial review by the higher court. The decision is based on § 132 (2) No. 1 of the Code of Administrative Court Procedure (VwGO) regarding the criteria for allowing a revision appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG; Consideration of species protection interests in site-specific preliminary impact assessment under the EIA Act: The dispute concerns the scope of a site-specific preliminary impact assessment (UVP-Vorprüfung) under the Environmental Impact Assessment Act, specifically whether and to what extent species protection interests must be considered during this screening phase. The court ordered that the case be reviewed on its merits because the question presents fundamental significance, particularly in light of the 2017 amendments to the EIA legal framework, thereby leaving the lower instance judgment subject to further judicial review by the higher court. The decision is based on § 132 (2) No. 1 of the Code of Administrative Court Procedure (VwGO) regarding the criteria for allowing a revision appeal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
esame di impatto ambientale protezione dell'ambiente decisione pregiudiziale potere di cognizione procedimento pregiudiziale decisione quadro

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Basis for granting leave to appeal for revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Die Festsetzung des Streitwerts beruht für das Beschwerdeverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Legal basis for the determination of the amount in dispute for the complaint proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Legal basis for the determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
7 B 11/17, 7 B 11/17 (7 C 5/18)
Inclusion of species protection interests in site-specific preliminary environmental impact assessment screenings under the EIA Act
7 B 12/17, 7 B 12/17 (7 C 6/18)
Consideration of species protection in location-based preliminary Environmental Impact Assessments
7 B 13/17, 7 B 13/17 (7 C 7/18)
Scope of species protection considerations in site-specific environmental impact assessment pre-screening
7 B 10/17, 7 B 10/17 (7 C 4/18)
Species protection in site-specific preliminary review under the Environmental Impact Assessment Act
7 C 7/18
Wind farm EIA screening: exclusion of individual species protection interests from site-specific preliminary review

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Basis for granting leave to appeal for revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Legal basis for the determination of the amount in dispute for the complaint proceedings.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG

Legal basis for the determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Berücksichtigung von Belangen des Artenschutzes bei standortbezogener Vorprüfung (UVP)

[GRUENDE]

Die zulässigen Beschwerden des Beklagten und der Beigeladenen sind begründet. Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Das Revisionsverfahren kann voraussichtlich zur Klärung der sich auch nach der durch das Inkrafttreten des Gesetzes zur Modernisierung des Rechts der Umweltverträglichkeitsprüfung vom 20. Juli 2017 (BGBl. I S. 2808) geänderten Rechtslage stellenden Frage beitragen, ob und gegebenenfalls inwieweit Belange des Artenschutzes bei der standortbezogenen Vorprüfung nach dem Umweltverträglichkeitsprüfungsgesetz zu berücksichtigen sind.

Die Festsetzung des Streitwerts beruht für das Beschwerdeverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.