Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
3 B 57/16, 3 B 57/16 (3 C 29/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:131217B3B57.16.0 Generato dall'IA

Claim for regulatory compensation of revenue deficits under EU Regulation No 1370/2007 due to implementation of an integrated fare system

Numero d'incarto 3 B 57/16, 3 B 57/16 (3 C 29/17)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court admitted an appeal to the senate, finding the case to be of fundamental significance, thereby allowing the appellate review to proceed; the dispute concerns a public transport operator’s claim for the enactment of a general provision to offset revenue deficits caused by an authority’s planned implementation of an integrated fare system, rather than a final judgment on the merits at this procedural stage. The decisive legal basis involves the question of whether a carrier is entitled to a compensatory regulatory measure under Article 3(2) and (3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 concerning public passenger transport services.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 GKG; Claim for regulatory compensation of revenue deficits under EU Regulation No 1370/2007 due to implementation of an integrated fare system: The decisive legal basis involves the question of whether a carrier is entitled to a compensatory regulatory measure under Article 3(2) and (3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 concerning public passenger transport services.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
trasporto collettivo poteri pubblici prestazione di servizi ordinamenti giuridici ricorso del personale compensazione ed assistenza ai passeggeri

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for admitting the appeal due to the question of fundamental significance.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Procedural basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute.
§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG
Procedural basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute.
Generato dall'IA
10 C 3/19
Equivalence of general provisions and public service contracts for compensating non-remunerative public transport tariffs under Regulation (EC) 1370/2007
3 C 28/11
Calculating compensation for reduced revenue in vocational education transport: applying approved subscription prices and excluding separable network-opening fees under § 45a PBefG
3 B 20/11, 3 B 20/11 (3 C 28/11)
Compensation calculation for student monthly tickets under § 45a PBefG: deductibility of revenue from network access rides outside school hours and routes
KZR 12/15
Suspension of litigation over excessive railway station fees pending regulatory review; directive-compatible exclusion of judicial fairness control under § 315 BGB
1 BvR 1417/10
Lump-sum compensation for free public transport of severely disabled passengers: validity of mandatory co-payment under § 148 para. 5 SGB IX under Art. 12 and 3 GG

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for admitting the appeal due to the question of fundamental significance.

§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG

Procedural basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Procedural basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Erlass einer allgemeinen Vorschrift durch Verkehrsunternehmen

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde hat Erfolg. Der Rechtssache kommt die geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) zu. Die Revision wird dem Senat voraussichtlich Gelegenheit geben, unter anderem die Frage zu klären, ob ein Verkehrsunternehmen einen Anspruch auf den Erlass einer allgemeinen Vorschrift nach Art. 3 Abs. 2 und 3 der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1370/2007 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 23. Oktober 2007 über öffentliche Personenverkehrsdienste auf Schiene und Straße und zur Aufhebung der Verordnungen (EWG) Nr. 1191/69 und EWG Nr. 1107/70 des Rates hat, wenn dies notwendig ist, um Mindereinnahmen auszugleichen, die sich aus der vom Aufgabenträger vorgesehenen Anwendung eines Verbundtarifs ergeben.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.