Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 B 13/17, 2 B 13/17 (2 C 47/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:241017B2B13.17.0 Generato dall'IA

Civil servant's claim for time-in-lieu under the principle of good faith for voluntary overtime not ordered by the employer

Numero d'incarto 2 B 13/17, 2 B 13/17 (2 C 47/17)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted permission to file an appeal (Revision), thereby suspending the lower court's judgment pending a final review by the same court. The dispute concerns a civil servant's claim for time-in-lieu (Zeitausgleich) for overtime work performed beyond ordered hours, specifically addressing whether such a claim arises under the principle of good faith (Treu und Glauben) when the official voluntarily undertakes the additional duty rather than being complicit in an unlawful order by the employer. The court identified the case as having fundamental legal significance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, specifically regarding the scope of good faith obligations in public service employment relationships. The decision also sets the preliminary amount in dispute for the appellate proceedings pursuant to §§ 47, 52, and 63 GKG.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 2 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und § 52 Abs. 2 GKG; Civil servant's claim for time-in-lieu under the principle of good faith for voluntary overtime not ordered by the employer: The dispute concerns a civil servant's claim for time-in-lieu (Zeitausgleich) for overtime work performed beyond ordered hours, specifically addressing whether such a claim arises under the principle of good faith (Treu und Glauben) when the official voluntarily undertakes the additional duty rather than being complicit in an unlawful order by the employer. The court identified the case as having fundamental legal significance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, specifically regarding the scope of good faith obligations in public service employment relationships. The decision also sets the preliminary amount in dispute for the appellate proceedings pursuant to §§ 47, 52, and 63 GKG.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
lavoro straordinario obbligo di lealtà durata legale del lavoro revisione di una decisione impieghi nella pubblica amministrazione doveri del funzionario

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for granting permission to appeal the revision because the case has fundamental significance.
§ 52 Abs. 2 GKG
Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 2 GKG. Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 63 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und § 52 Abs. 2 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 2 GKG
Procedural rule applied to set the value in dispute for the complaint procedure.
§ 63 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und § 52 Abs. 2 GKG
Procedural rule applied to set the preliminary value in dispute for the revision procedure.
Generato dall'IA
2 B 16/17, 2 B 16/17 (2 C 48/17)
Civil servant's voluntary overtime: entitlement to time compensation under the doctrine of good faith absent employer's unlawful order
2 B 15/17, 2 B 15/17 (2 C 44/17)
Good-faith claim for compensatory time off when civil servant voluntarily exceeds ordered working hours
2 B 11/17, 2 B 11/17 (2 C 45/17)
Time compensation claim for voluntary public service overtime: good faith principles versus unilateral employer compulsion
2 B 12/17, 2 B 12/17 (2 C 46/17)
Public servant’s claim for time compensation based on good faith for voluntary service beyond ordered duty hours
2 C 46/17
Public servant’s claim for compensation for voluntary equipment donning outside scheduled shifts under Treu und Glauben

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for granting permission to appeal the revision because the case has fundamental significance.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 2 GKG

Procedural rule applied to set the value in dispute for the complaint procedure.

§ 63 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und § 52 Abs. 2 GKG

Procedural rule applied to set the preliminary value in dispute for the revision procedure.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Die Revision des Beklagten ist zuzulassen, weil die Rechtssache grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne von § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO hat. Das Revisionsverfahren erscheint zur Klärung der sinngemäß aufgeworfenen Frage geeignet, ob sich ein Anspruch auf Zeitausgleich aus dem Grundsatz von Treu und Glauben auch dann ergeben kann, wenn nicht der Dienstherr den Beamten einseitig in rechtswidrigem Umfang zum Dienst herangezogen hat, sondern wenn sich der Beamte selbst in der Pflicht gesehen hat, über die angeordnete Arbeitszeit hinaus Dienst zu leisten.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 2 GKG. Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 63 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und § 52 Abs. 2 GKG.