Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 B 15/17, 2 B 15/17 (2 C 44/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:241017B2B15.17.0 Generato dall'IA

Good-faith claim for compensatory time off when civil servant voluntarily exceeds ordered working hours

Numero d'incarto 2 B 15/17, 2 B 15/17 (2 C 44/17)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) admitted the defendant’s appeal for revision, effectively allowing the case to proceed to the Supreme Court on a matter of fundamental legal significance, thereby keeping the lower instance’s judgment on the substantive merits pending final resolution. The dispute concerns whether a civil servant can claim compensation in the form of time off (Zeitausgleich) based on the principle of good faith (Treu und Glauben) when they voluntarily perform duties exceeding the ordered working hours, specifically distinguishing this scenario from instances where the employer unlawfully mandates overtime. The decisive legal basis is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which permits revision appeals in cases of fundamental legal significance, as the court deemed the question of the scope of good faith-based compensation claims in voluntary overtime situations suitable for clarification at the highest administrative court level.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG; Good-faith claim for compensatory time off when civil servant voluntarily exceeds ordered working hours: The dispute concerns whether a civil servant can claim compensation in the form of time off (Zeitausgleich) based on the principle of good faith (Treu und Glauben) when they voluntarily perform duties exceeding the ordered working hours, specifically distinguishing this scenario from instances where the employer unlawfully mandates overtime. The decisive legal basis is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which permits revision appeals in cases of fundamental legal significance, as the court deemed the question of the scope of good faith-based compensation claims in voluntary overtime situations suitable for clarification at the highest administrative court level.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
compensazione delle ore straordinarie durata legale del lavoro buona fede doveri del funzionario ferie non retribuite revisione di una decisione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Ground for admitting the appeal for revision due to fundamental legal significance of the case.
§ 52 Abs. 2 GKG
Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 2 GKG. Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 63 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und § 52 Abs. 2 GKG.
Generato dall'IA
2 B 16/17, 2 B 16/17 (2 C 48/17)
Civil servant's voluntary overtime: entitlement to time compensation under the doctrine of good faith absent employer's unlawful order
2 B 13/17, 2 B 13/17 (2 C 47/17)
Civil servant's claim for time-in-lieu under the principle of good faith for voluntary overtime not ordered by the employer
2 B 11/17, 2 B 11/17 (2 C 45/17)
Time compensation claim for voluntary public service overtime: good faith principles versus unilateral employer compulsion
2 B 12/17, 2 B 12/17 (2 C 46/17)
Public servant’s claim for time compensation based on good faith for voluntary service beyond ordered duty hours
2 B 43/18
Compensatory time off for unapproved overtime in police shift work: requirement of specific employer order under § 88 BBG and pre-assertion of illegality for good-faith claims

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Ground for admitting the appeal for revision due to fundamental legal significance of the case.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Die Revision des Beklagten ist zuzulassen, weil die Rechtssache grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne von § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO hat. Das Revisionsverfahren erscheint zur Klärung der sinngemäß aufgeworfenen Frage geeignet, ob sich ein Anspruch auf Zeitausgleich aus dem Grundsatz von Treu und Glauben auch dann ergeben kann, wenn nicht der Dienstherr den Beamten einseitig in rechtswidrigem Umfang zum Dienst herangezogen hat, sondern wenn sich der Beamte selbst in der Pflicht gesehen hat, über die angeordnete Arbeitszeit hinaus Dienst zu leisten.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 2 GKG. Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 63 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und § 52 Abs. 2 GKG.