Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
2 B 11/17, 2 B 11/17 (2 C 45/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:241017B2B11.17.0 Generato dall'IA

Time compensation claim for voluntary public service overtime: good faith principles versus unilateral employer compulsion

Numero d'incarto 2 B 11/17, 2 B 11/17 (2 C 45/17)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the defendant's appeal for the sake of fundamental legal significance, leaving the lower instance decision pending further review in the proceedings on the merits. The dispute concerns a public servant's claim for time compensation (Zeitausgleich) for voluntary overtime work performed beyond mandated hours, challenging whether such a claim arises when the employee acted out of a perceived duty rather than being unlawfully compelled by the employer. The decisive legal basis is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which grants leave to appeal if the case clarifies a question of fundamental significance, specifically whether the principles of good faith and trust (Treu und Glauben) in the public employment relationship create a right to time compensation in the absence of unilateral, unlawful service deployment by the employer.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 2 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und § 52 Abs. 2 GKG; Time compensation claim for voluntary public service overtime: good faith principles versus unilateral employer compulsion: The dispute concerns a public servant's claim for time compensation (Zeitausgleich) for voluntary overtime work performed beyond mandated hours, challenging whether such a claim arises when the employee acted out of a perceived duty rather than being unlawfully compelled by the employer. The decisive legal basis is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which grants leave to appeal if the case clarifies a question of fundamental significance, specifically whether the principles of good faith and trust (Treu und Glauben) in the public employment relationship create a right to time compensation in the absence of unilateral, unlawful service deployment by the employer.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
compensazione delle ore straordinarie buona fede durata legale del lavoro impieghi nella pubblica amministrazione rapporto di lavoro diritto al lavoro

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for admitting the appeal due to the case's fundamental legal significance regarding the claim for time compensation based on good faith.
§ 52 Abs. 2 GKG
Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 2 GKG. Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 63 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und § 52 Abs. 2 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 2 GKG
Procedural basis for the determination of the matter in dispute in the complaint proceedings.
§ 63 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und § 52 Abs. 2 GKG
Procedural basis for the preliminary determination of the matter in dispute in the revision proceedings.
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for admitting the appeal due to the case's fundamental legal significance regarding the claim for time compensation based on good faith.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 2 GKG

Procedural basis for the determination of the matter in dispute in the complaint proceedings.

§ 63 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und § 52 Abs. 2 GKG

Procedural basis for the preliminary determination of the matter in dispute in the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Zeitausgleich, auch wenn sich der Beamte selbst in der Pflicht gesehen hat, über die angeordnete Arbeitszeit hinaus Dienst zu leisten

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision des Beklagten ist zuzulassen, weil die Rechtssache grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne von § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO hat. Das Revisionsverfahren erscheint zur Klärung der sinngemäß aufgeworfenen Frage geeignet, ob sich ein Anspruch auf Zeitausgleich aus dem Grundsatz von Treu und Glauben auch dann ergeben kann, wenn nicht der Dienstherr den Beamten einseitig in rechtswidrigem Umfang zum Dienst herangezogen hat, sondern wenn sich der Beamte selbst in der Pflicht gesehen hat, über die angeordnete Arbeitszeit hinaus Dienst zu leisten.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 2 GKG. Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 63 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und § 52 Abs. 2 GKG.