Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 B 55/16, 2 B 55/16 (2 C 21/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:140617B2B55.16.0 Generato dall'IA

Forfeiture of civil servant's damages claim for delayed or omitted promotion: requirements for the time and circumstance elements of Verwirkung

Numero d'incarto 2 B 55/16, 2 B 55/16 (2 C 21/17)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) admitted the appeal for revision, finding that the case possesses fundamental legal significance and involves a divergence from prior case law, thereby allowing the higher court to review the lower instance's judgment. The dispute concerns the forfeiture (Verwirkung) of a civil servant's tort claim for damages resulting from delayed or omitted promotion, specifically addressing the requirements for the time element (Zeitmoment) and circumstances element (Umstandsmoment). The decision highlights a conflict with the Higher Administrative Court of Koblenz regarding the applicable standards for these forfeiture conditions, necessitating clarification on the prerequisites for losing a beamtenrechtliche Schadensersatzanspruch due to undue delay in asserting the claim.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 3 GKG, § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO i.V.m. § 127 Nr. 1 BRRG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 3 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 3 GKG; Forfeiture of civil servant's damages claim for delayed or omitted promotion: requirements for the time and circumstance elements of Verwirkung: The dispute concerns the forfeiture (Verwirkung) of a civil servant's tort claim for damages resulting from delayed or omitted promotion, specifically addressing the requirements for the time element (Zeitmoment) and circumstances element (Umstandsmoment). The decision highlights a conflict with the Higher Administrative Court of Koblenz regarding the applicable standards for these forfeiture conditions, necessitating clarification on the prerequisites for losing a beamtenrechtliche Schadensersatzanspruch due to undue delay in asserting the claim.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
perenzione del diritto amministrativo revisione di una decisione risarcimento per atto illecito causa civile decisioni in materia di promozione interpretazione del diritto

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for admitting the revision due to the fundamental legal significance of the case.
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO
1 VwGO) und wegen Divergenz (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO i.V.m.
§ 52 Abs. 3 GKG
Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 3 GKG. Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 63 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 3 GKG.
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO i.V.m. § 127 Nr. 1 BRRG
Ground for admitting the revision due to a divergence in legal interpretation compared to prior case law.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 3 GKG
Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute for the complaint proceedings.
§ 63 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 3 GKG
Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
10 A 10738/14
Dezember 2014 - 10 A 10738/14.OVG -, beurteilten Rechtsfragen zu entscheiden.
Generato dall'IA
2 B 23/17, 2 B 23/17 (2 C 22/17)
Forfeiture of Civil Servant Damages Claims for Delayed Promotion: Time and Circumstance Requirements
2 C 10/17
Forfeiture of a public servant's right to challenge a rival's promotion due to delayed assertion despite knowledge of regular promotion cycles
2 B 54/16, 2 B 54/16 (2 C 19/17)
Waiver requirements for civil service damages claims based on delayed or omitted promotion: time and circumstance elements
2 B 27/17, 2 B 27/17 (2 C 66/17)
Civil servant's damages claim for missed promotion: whether informal inquiries and legal remedies constitute "Rechtsmittel" under § 839(3) BGB
2 B 57/16, 2 B 57/16 (2 C 20/17)
Evidentiary weight of fax transmission reports and forfeiture requirements for civil service promotion claims

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for admitting the revision due to the fundamental legal significance of the case.

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO i.V.m. § 127 Nr. 1 BRRG

Ground for admitting the revision due to a divergence in legal interpretation compared to prior case law.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 3 GKG

Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute for the complaint proceedings.

§ 63 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 3 GKG

Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Anforderungen an Zeit- und Umstandsmoment bei Verwirkung eines beamtenrechtlichen Schadensersatzanspruchs wegen verspäteter oder unterbliebener Beförderung

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision wird wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) und wegen Divergenz (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO i.V.m. § 127 Nr. 1 BRRG) zugelassen.

Das Revisionsverfahren erscheint geeignet, zur Klärung der von der Beschwerde aufgeworfenen Fragen beizutragen, welche Anforderungen an das Zeit- und das Umstandsmoment bei der Verwirkung eines beamtenrechtlichen Schadensersatzanspruchs wegen verspäteter oder unterbliebener Beförderung zu stellen sind. Gleichzeitig gibt das Revisionsverfahren dem Senat die Gelegenheit, über die vom Berufungsgericht im angefochtenen Urteil abweichend vom Oberverwaltungsgericht Koblenz, Beschluss vom 18. Dezember 2014 - 10 A 10738/14.OVG -, beurteilten Rechtsfragen zu entscheiden.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 3 GKG. Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 63 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3 und § 52 Abs. 3 GKG.