Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
10 B 21/16, 10 B 21/16 (10 C 4/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:210617B10B21.16.0 Generato dall'IA

Scope of asset allocation reservations under VZOG: limitation to corporate share divestments

Numero d'incarto 10 B 21/16, 10 B 21/16 (10 C 4/17)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Spese processuali senza spese
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court granted the defendant’s complaint and admitted the appeal on grounds of fundamental significance, leaving no immediate judgment on the merits pending the subsequent revision proceedings. The dispute concerned the interpretation of property allocation reservations under the German Asset Allocation Act (VZOG), specifically whether such reservations are restricted to the factual context of the divestment of corporate shares. The decisive legal issue centers on the scope of §§ 1c and 11(1) Sentence 3 No. 5 VZOG, requiring the court to determine if the law implies a strict nexus between asset reservations and corporate share sales.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 6 Abs. 3 Satz 1 VZOG, § 6 Abs. 3 Satz 2 VZOG; Scope of asset allocation reservations under VZOG: limitation to corporate share divestments: The dispute concerned the interpretation of property allocation reservations under the German Asset Allocation Act (VZOG), specifically whether such reservations are restricted to the factual context of the divestment of corporate shares. The decisive legal issue centers on the scope of §§ 1c and 11(1) Sentence 3 No. 5 VZOG, requiring the court to determine if the law implies a strict nexus between asset reservations and corporate share sales.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
patrimonio a destinazione vincolata compravendita di azioni interpretazione della sentenza estensione dell'espropriazione procedura pendente diritti patrimoniali

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Legal basis for admitting the appeal on grounds of fundamental legal significance.
§ 6 Abs. 3 Satz 1 VZOG
Basis for the waiver of court costs.
§ 6 Abs. 3 Satz 2 VZOG
Basis for determining the amount in dispute for cost assessment purposes.
Generato dall'IA
10 C 4/17
Invalidity of contractual allocation reservations in asset deals under § 11(1)(3)(5) VZOG
3 B 8/10
Asset allocation revocation: Discretionary restrictions under VZOG and statute of limitations commencement
8 B 54/21, 8 B 54/21 (8 C 5/22)
§ 11 VZOG Restitution vs. prior asset allocation: whether valid prior allocation precludes restitution under Art. 21, 22 EV
3 B 36/11
Forfeiture of asset allocation claims and revocation of allocation orders under VZOG
3 B 3/12, 3 B 3/12 (3 C 12/12)
Allocation of former Prussian agricultural assets under § 2 Abs. 1 Satz 6 VZOG: sufficiency of agreement on general principles versus specific assets

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Legal basis for admitting the appeal on grounds of fundamental legal significance.

§ 6 Abs. 3 Satz 1 VZOG

Basis for the waiver of court costs.

§ 6 Abs. 3 Satz 2 VZOG

Basis for determining the amount in dispute for cost assessment purposes.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Zuordnungsvorbehalte aus dem Vermögenszuordnungsgesetz

[GRUENDE]

Die zulässige Beschwerde der Beklagten ist begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren führt auf die Frage, ob sich aus §§ 1c, 11 Abs. 1 Satz 3 Nr. 5 des Vermögenszuordnungsgesetzes - VZOG - ergibt, dass Zuordnungsvorbehalte nur im sachlichen Zusammenhang mit der Veräußerung von Unternehmensanteilen zulässig sind.

Gerichtskosten werden gemäß § 6 Abs. 3 Satz 1 VZOG nicht erhoben. Wegen des Gegenstandswerts wird auf § 6 Abs. 3 Satz 2 VZOG hingewiesen.