Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
7 B 13/16, 7 B 13/16 (7 C 22/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:290617B7B13.16.0 Generato dall'IA

Admission of revision in nature conservation association litigation: objectionability of jurisdictional rules against a plan approval decision

Numero d'incarto 7 B 13/16, 7 B 13/16 (7 C 22/17)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) ordered the admission of the plaintiff’s appeal on points of law, finding the complaint admissible and substantiated, while simultaneously setting the value in dispute for both the complaint and revision proceedings. The case involves a nature conservation association bringing a procedural challenge (Vereinsklage) against a plan approval decision (Planfeststellungsbeschluss). The decisive legal basis for the admission is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which permits revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question: whether jurisdictional rules (Zuständigkeitsvorschriften) are subject to procedural objection (rügefähig) in association litigation concerning nature conservation plan approvals.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG; Admission of revision in nature conservation association litigation: objectionability of jurisdictional rules against a plan approval decision: The case involves a nature conservation association bringing a procedural challenge (Vereinsklage) against a plan approval decision (Planfeststellungsbeschluss). The decisive legal basis for the admission is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which permits revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question: whether jurisdictional rules (Zuständigkeitsvorschriften) are subject to procedural objection (rügefähig) in association litigation concerning nature conservation plan approvals.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
autorizzazione in materia di protezione della natura censure procedurali impugnazione di decisioni amministrative motivi di revisione valore litigioso associazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question regarding the objectionability of jurisdictional rules in association litigation.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Die Festsetzung des Streitwerts beruht für das Beschwerdeverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Provision used to determine the value in dispute for the complaint proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Provision used to determine the value in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
9 B 10/10
Preclusion of nature conservation associations' species protection objections under § 61(3) BNatSchG requiring substantive critique of administrative findings during the plan approval procedure
9 A 21/11, 9 A 21/11 (9 A 12/10)
Hearing objection rejected: preclusion of habitat and species objections in plan approval proceedings
4 BN 39/20
Validity of detailed development plan under §§ 1, 1a, 132 VwGO: Mandatory determination of nature-protection avoidance measures via § 9 BauGB versus alternative compliance mechanisms
10 CN 1/23, 10 CN 1/23 (4 CN 4/18)
Standing of environmental association to challenge landscape protection ordinance under primacy of EU law and Aarhus Convention
4 BN 21/20
Bebauungsplan validity: weighting of nature conservation avoidance measures under § 1a Abs. 3 BauGB and their requirement for binding zoning determinations

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question regarding the objectionability of jurisdictional rules in association litigation.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Provision used to determine the value in dispute for the complaint proceedings.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG

Provision used to determine the value in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; naturschutzrechtliche Vereinsklage

[GRUENDE]

Die zulässige Beschwerde des Klägers ist begründet. Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Das Revisionsverfahren kann voraussichtlich zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, ob bei einer naturschutzrechtlichen Vereinsklage gegen einen Planfeststellungsbeschluss Zuständigkeitsvorschriften rügefähig sind.

Die Festsetzung des Streitwerts beruht für das Beschwerdeverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.