Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
9 B 60/16, 9 B 60/16 (9 C 1/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:040517B9B60.16.0 Generato dall'IA

Foreseeability of future road network developments in traffic forecasts for road planning

Numero d'incarto 9 B 60/16, 9 B 60/16 (9 C 1/17)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court ordered the admission of an appeal on points of law, ruling that the defendant’s complaint against the lower court’s partial grant of relief was both admissible and well-founded; consequently, the appeal will proceed to the Federal Administrative Court to clarify the legal standard for when future developments in the road network are foreseeable and must be considered in traffic forecasts for planned roads. The dispute concerned a legal challenge to a road planning decision, specifically the assessment of traffic prognoses in the context of infrastructure development. The decision is grounded in § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 of the Administrative Court Code (VwGO), which mandates the admission of an appeal where the case involves a question of fundamental legal significance, and the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute follows §§ 47, 52, and 63 of the Court Costs Act (GKG).

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Foreseeability of future road network developments in traffic forecasts for road planning: The dispute concerned a legal challenge to a road planning decision, specifically the assessment of traffic prognoses in the context of infrastructure development. The decision is grounded in § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 of the Administrative Court Code (VwGO), which mandates the admission of an appeal where the case involves a question of fundamental legal significance, and the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute follows §§ 47, 52, and 63 of the Court Costs Act (GKG).

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
costruzione stradale diritto della circolazione stradale decisione pregiudiziale impugnazione di decisioni amministrative spese per l'allestimento dei piani autorizzazione parziale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Primary legal basis for admitting the appeal on points of law due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Provisions cited for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute in the appeal proceedings.
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Primary legal basis for admitting the appeal on points of law due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Provisions cited for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute in the appeal proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Verkehrsprognose bei Straßenplanung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Beklagten, mit der er die Zulassung der Revision begehrt, soweit die Klage nicht bereits abgewiesen worden ist, ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit geben zur weiteren Klärung der Frage, ab wann zukünftige Entwicklungen im Straßennetz als vorhersehbar anzusehen und deshalb bei der Verkehrsprognose für eine geplante Straße zu berücksichtigen sind.

Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.