Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 B 23/17, 1 B 23/17 (1 C 6/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:270317B1B23.17.0 Generato dall'IA

Revision leave for standard of proof on feasibility of expulsion under asylum law

Numero d'incarto 1 B 23/17, 1 B 23/17 (1 C 6/17)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted leave to file a revision appeal, finding that the case raised a question of fundamental legal significance under § 132(2)(1) VwGO, thereby allowing the appellant to proceed against the prior decision. The dispute concerns the interpretation of the requirements for establishing that an expulsion is "capable of being carried out" under § 34a(1) Sentence 1 of the Asylum Act (AsylG) and the legal consequences if this threshold is not met. The court specifically authorized the further clarification of the prerequisites for this determination and the ensuing legal effects, identifying these undefined standards as the decisive legal issue requiring review.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 34a Abs. 1 Satz 1 AsylG; Revision leave for standard of proof on feasibility of expulsion under asylum law: The dispute concerns the interpretation of the requirements for establishing that an expulsion is "capable of being carried out" under § 34a(1) Sentence 1 of the Asylum Act (AsylG) and the legal consequences if this threshold is not met. The court specifically authorized the further clarification of the prerequisites for this determination and the ensuing legal effects, identifying these undefined standards as the decisive legal issue requiring review.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
revisione in materia d'asilo grado della prova inesigibilità dell'esecuzione dell'allontanamento allontanamento in diritto degli stranieri interpretazione del diritto competenza in materia d'asilo

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Cited as the legal basis for granting leave to appeal the revision due to the question of fundamental legal significance.
§ 34a Abs. 1 Satz 1 AsylG
1 VwGO) zuzulassen, weil sie dem Senat Gelegenheit zur weiteren Klärung der Fragen geben kann, unter welchen Voraussetzungen im Sinne des § 34a Abs. 1 Satz 1 AsylG "feststeht", dass eine Abschiebung durchgeführt werden kann, und welche Rechtsfolgen sich ergeben, wenn dies nicht der Fall ist
Generato dall'IA
1 B 59/17
Admissibility of revision appeal in asylum cases: Divergence and fundamental significance requirements for factual assessments of persecution risk
10 B 4/10, 10 B 4/10 (10 C 25/10)
Revocation of refugee status: Standard of proof for the risk of renewed persecution
1 B 4/13
Befristung der Sperrwirkung einer Ausweisung: Voraussetzungen der Abweichung vom Ausreise-Erfordernis bei Asylberechtigten
1 B 108/17, 1 PKH 62/17, 1 B 108/17, 1 PKH 62/17
Asylum: Admissibility of revision based on factual discrepancies between regional courts regarding threat of persecution for military service evasion
1 B 58/16, 1 B 58/16 (1 C 18/16)
Admissibility of Revision: Interpreting Interplay Between §§ 26a and 27a AsylG

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Cited as the legal basis for granting leave to appeal the revision due to the question of fundamental legal significance.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Voraussetzung für das Feststehen der Abschiebungsdurchführbarkeit

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) zuzulassen, weil sie dem Senat Gelegenheit zur weiteren Klärung der Fragen geben kann, unter welchen Voraussetzungen im Sinne des § 34a Abs. 1 Satz 1 AsylG "feststeht", dass eine Abschiebung durchgeführt werden kann, und welche Rechtsfolgen sich ergeben, wenn dies nicht der Fall ist