Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
4 BN 35/16, 4 BN 35/16 (4 CN 6/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:280217B4BN35.16.0 Generato dall'IA

Admissibility of Revision for Clarifying Permissibility of Combining Permanent and Holiday Residences in Special Zones under § 11 Abs. 1 BauNVO

Numero d'incarto 4 BN 35/16, 4 BN 35/16 (4 CN 6/17)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) admitted an appeal on points of law, granting the complainant's request and finding the appeal meritorious, thereby resolving the procedural status of the case in favor of the party challenging the lower court's refusal to permit review. The dispute concerned land-use planning law, specifically whether a special zone under the German Building Code could legally combine provisions for permanent residence and holiday housing. The decisive legal basis for the decision was § 132 Abs. 1 and § 133 Abs. 1 of the Administrative Procedure Act (VwGO), with the admissibility of the revision grounded in § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO due to the fundamental significance of the question regarding the permissibility of such zoning combinations under § 11 Abs. 1 of the Federal Building Ordinance (BauNVO).

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 133 Abs. 1 VwGO, § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 132 Abs. 1, § 133 Abs. 1 VwGO, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Admissibility of Revision for Clarifying Permissibility of Combining Permanent and Holiday Residences in Special Zones under § 11 Abs. 1 BauNVO: The dispute concerned land-use planning law, specifically whether a special zone under the German Building Code could legally combine provisions for permanent residence and holiday housing. The decisive legal basis for the decision was § 132 Abs. 1 and § 133 Abs. 1 of the Administrative Procedure Act (VwGO), with the admissibility of the revision grounded in § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO due to the fundamental significance of the question regarding the permissibility of such zoning combinations under § 11 Abs. 1 of the Federal Building Ordinance (BauNVO).

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
legge sugli alloggi permessi di dimora zona edificabile revisione processuale licenza edilizia procedura di pianificazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Provides the main ground for admitting the appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.

§ 132 Abs. 1, § 133 Abs. 1 VwGO

Establishes the procedural basis for the admissibility of the complaint filed against the refusal to admit the revision.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Dauerwohnen und Ferienwohnen im Sondergebiet nach § 11 Abs. 1 BauNVO

[GRUENDE]

Die nach § 132 Abs. 1, § 133 Abs. 1 VwGO zulässige Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann voraussichtlich zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, ob eine Kombination von Dauerwohnen und Ferienwohnen in einem Sondergebiet nach § 11 Abs. 1 BauNVO festgesetzt werden kann.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.