Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
5 PB 8/16, 5 PB 8/16 (5 P 2/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:260117B5PB8.16.0 Generato dall'IA

Co-determination rights of the staff council in determining limited service capability and reducing working hours

Numero d'incarto 5 PB 8/16, 5 PB 8/16 (5 P 2/17)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the appellant's legal complaint to the Senate, finding it raised a fundamental legal question of decisive importance, but issued no substantive judgment on the merits. The dispute concerned whether the staff council holds a co-determination right under § 68(1) No. 6 of the Federal Personnel Representation Act in cases where an employee is deemed to have limited service capability and their working hours are subsequently reduced. The decision rests on § 95(2) of the Federal Personnel Representation Act in conjunction with § 92(1) sentence 2 and § 72(2) No. 1 of the Labor Court Act, which permit the admission of a complaint to clarify questions of fundamental significance.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG; Co-determination rights of the staff council in determining limited service capability and reducing working hours: Die Rechtsbeschwerde des Antragstellers ist gemäß § 95 Abs. 2 PersVG BB i.V.m. § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2, § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG wegen einer entscheidungserheblichen Rechtsfrage von grundsätzlicher Bedeutung zuzulassen.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
durata e orario di lavoro doveri e diritti dell'agente professioni amministrative diritto al lavoro diritti fondamentali rappresentanza legale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Zulassung der Rechtsbeschwerde; Mitwirkung des Personalrates bei Feststellung der begrenzten Dienstfähigkeit und Herabsetzung der Arbeitszeit

[GRUENDE]

Die Rechtsbeschwerde des Antragstellers ist gemäß § 95 Abs. 2 PersVG BB i.V.m. § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2, § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG wegen einer entscheidungserheblichen Rechtsfrage von grundsätzlicher Bedeutung zuzulassen.

Die Rechtssache kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, ob im Falle der Feststellung der begrenzten Dienstfähigkeit und Herabsetzung der Arbeitszeit ein Mitwirkungsrecht des Personalrates gemäß § 68 Abs. 1 Nr. 6 PersVG BB besteht.