Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
5 PB 9/16, 5 PB 9/16 (5 P 3/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:260117B5PB9.16.0 Generato dall'IA

Personnel council participation rights in determining limited serviceability and reducing working hours under § 68(1) no. 6 PersVG BB

Numero d'incarto 5 PB 9/16, 5 PB 9/16 (5 P 3/17)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the applicant's legal complaint (Rechtsbeschwerde), ruling that the case is of fundamental legal significance. The dispute concerns whether the works council possesses a participation right (Mitwirkungsrecht) under § 68(1) no. 6 of the Federal Act on Personnel Councils (PersVG BB) when an agency determines limited serviceability and reduces an employee's working hours. The court relied on § 95(2) PersVG BB in conjunction with § 92(1) sentence 2 and § 72(2) no. 1 of the Labor Court Act (ArbGG) to permit the appeal, leaving the underlying administrative decision pending further review to clarify this specific labor law issue.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG, § 95 Abs. 2 PersVG BB, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2, § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG; Personnel council participation rights in determining limited serviceability and reducing working hours under § 68(1) no. 6 PersVG BB: The dispute concerns whether the works council possesses a participation right (Mitwirkungsrecht) under § 68(1) no. 6 of the Federal Act on Personnel Councils (PersVG BB) when an agency determines limited serviceability and reduces an employee's working hours. The court relied on § 95(2) PersVG BB in conjunction with § 92(1) sentence 2 and § 72(2) no. 1 of the Labor Court Act (ArbGG) to permit the appeal, leaving the underlying administrative decision pending further review to clarify this specific labor law issue.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
durata e orario di lavoro diritto al lavoro professioni amministrative diritti fondamentali permesso di lavoro diritti del funzionario

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG
1 Satz 2, § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG wegen einer entscheidungserheblichen Rechtsfrage von grundsätzlicher Bedeutung zuzulassen.
§ 95 Abs. 2 PersVG BB
Main ground for allowing the legal complaint due to a question of fundamental legal significance.
§ 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2, § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG
Procedural rules in conjunction with the personnel council act that form the basis for the admissibility of the complaint.
Generato dall'IA
5 P 3/17
Works council participation rights in reduced working hours for limited serviceability under § 27 BeamtStG: analogy to early retirement provision due to legislative gap
5 P 4/17
Staff Council Participation Rights in Reducing Working Hours Due to Limited Service Capability of Civil Servants
5 PB 10/16, 5 PB 10/16 (5 P 4/17)
Co-decision rights of employee representation in determining limited fitness for service and reducing working hours
5 P 2/17
Co-determination rights of the staff council in reducing civil servant working hours for limited service capacity under German staff council law
6 P 4/10
Works council participation rights for inter-departmental transfer of personnel powers as a general regulation under § 75 NdsPersVG and resulting claim for revocation

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 95 Abs. 2 PersVG BB

Main ground for allowing the legal complaint due to a question of fundamental legal significance.

§ 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2, § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG

Procedural rules in conjunction with the personnel council act that form the basis for the admissibility of the complaint.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Zulassung der Rechtsbeschwerde; Mitwirkung des Personalrates bei Feststellung der begrenzten Dienstfähigkeit und Herabsetzung der Arbeitszeit

[GRUENDE]

Die Rechtsbeschwerde des Antragstellers ist gemäß § 95 Abs. 2 PersVG BB i.V.m. § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2, § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG wegen einer entscheidungserheblichen Rechtsfrage von grundsätzlicher Bedeutung zuzulassen.

Die Rechtssache kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, ob im Falle der Feststellung der begrenzten Dienstfähigkeit und Herabsetzung der Arbeitszeit ein Mitwirkungsrecht des Personalrates gemäß § 68 Abs. 1 Nr. 6 PersVG BB besteht.