Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
3 B 21/16, 3 B 21/16 (3 C 4/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:090217B3B21.16.0 Generato dall'IA

Licensing requirement under the Passenger Transport Act for patient transport operated by an outpatient rehabilitation facility

Numero d'incarto 3 B 21/16, 3 B 21/16 (3 C 4/17)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court granted leave to appeal, finding that the case possesses fundamental significance, thereby allowing the subsequent full merits hearing to proceed. The dispute concerns the permissibility of a transport service operated by a provider of outpatient rehabilitation for transporting patients between their homes and the facility, specifically challenging the lower court's assessment of whether such a service constitutes a public passenger transport operation. The decisive legal question is whether a license under § 1(1) in conjunction with § 2(1) of the Passenger Transport Act (PBefG) is mandatory for this specific type of patient transport.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 GKG, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Licensing requirement under the Passenger Transport Act for patient transport operated by an outpatient rehabilitation facility: The dispute concerns the permissibility of a transport service operated by a provider of outpatient rehabilitation for transporting patients between their homes and the facility, specifically challenging the lower court's assessment of whether such a service constitutes a public passenger transport operation. The decisive legal question is whether a license under § 1(1) in conjunction with § 2(1) of the Passenger Transport Act (PBefG) is mandatory for this specific type of patient transport.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
trasporto collettivo centro di riadattamento pubblica udienza necessità di cure mediche autorizzazione generale uso di veicolo a motore

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Ground for granting leave to appeal due to fundamental significance of the case.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Basis for the imposition of court fees in the revision procedure.
§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG
Basis for the preliminary determination of the matter in dispute for the revision procedure.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Basis for the calculation of court fees for the revision procedure.
Generato dall'IA
10 C 1/19
Patient transport service: licensing requirement and scope of “own vehicles” and “inpatient” exemptions under PBefG and FrStllgV
IV R 37/19
Scope of vehicle tax exemption for patient transport: medical necessity via prescription without requirement for on-board medical care or emergency response
IV R 41/19
Tax exemption for patient transport vehicles: sufficiency of medical prescriptions and exclusion of en-route care requirements
III R 47/18
Kraftfahrzeugsteuer: Krankenbeförderung requires medically ill passengers and treatment-related transport, not just disability
5 C 14/19
Reimbursement of travel costs for medical treatment requires a specific physician's order for transport, not just a treatment certificate, even when using a private vehicle.

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Ground for granting leave to appeal due to fundamental significance of the case.

§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG

Basis for the preliminary determination of the matter in dispute for the revision procedure.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Basis for the calculation of court fees for the revision procedure.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for the imposition of court fees in the revision procedure.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Erforderlichkeit einer Genehmigung für Fahrdienst

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde hat Erfolg. Der Rechtssache kommt grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne von § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zu. Das Revisionsverfahren wird dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht voraussichtlich Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, wann für einen Fahrdienst, den der Träger einer Einrichtung für ambulante Rehabilitation für den Transport der Patienten zwischen deren Wohnung und der Rehabilitationseinrichtung betreibt, eine Genehmigung nach § 1 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 2 Abs. 1 des Personenbeförderungsgesetzes erforderlich ist.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.