Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
8 B 48/16, 8 B 48/16 (8 C 2/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:190117B8B48.16.0 Generato dall'IA

Prerequisites for fractional restitution of expropriated corporate shares under § 3 Abs. 1 Satz 4 Halbs. 2 VermG

Numero d'incarto 8 B 48/16, 8 B 48/16 (8 C 2/17)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted the defendant's complaint and admitted a revision appeal on grounds of fundamental legal significance, while also fixing the preliminary amount in dispute for the subsequent proceedings. The case concerns a dispute over the prerequisites for fractional restitution (Bruchteilsrestitution) of property interests, specifically whether an claim for the return of shares or assets expropriated due to political persecution in entities located outside the territory of the former German Democratic Republic is legally dependent on compensation having been provided under a law enacted after May 8, 1945. The decisive legal basis is § 3 Abs. 1 Satz 4 Halbs. 2 of the German Property Act (VermG) and § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which the court identified as requiring clarification on the conditions for restitution in cross-border contexts involving pre-reunification expropriation.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 GKG, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Prerequisites for fractional restitution of expropriated corporate shares under § 3 Abs. 1 Satz 4 Halbs. 2 VermG: The case concerns a dispute over the prerequisites for fractional restitution (Bruchteilsrestitution) of property interests, specifically whether an claim for the return of shares or assets expropriated due to political persecution in entities located outside the territory of the former German Democratic Republic is legally dependent on compensation having been provided under a law enacted after May 8, 1945. The decisive legal basis is § 3 Abs. 1 Satz 4 Halbs. 2 of the German Property Act (VermG) and § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which the court identified as requiring clarification on the conditions for restitution in cross-border contexts involving pre-reunification expropriation.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
retrocessione di beni espropriati persona giuridica motivi di revisione sostanza perdita dei diritti sociali procedura preparatoria

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for the verdict, as the court explicitly ordered the admission of the revision based on fundamental legal significance under this provision.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Procedural provision cited in the second order for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute.
§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG
Procedural provision cited in the second order for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Procedural provision cited in the second order for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute.
Generato dall'IA
8 C 10/16
Prerequisite of prior restitution for fractional restitution claims based on expropriation of Western shareholdings in holding companies with assets in the accession area
8 B 106/09
Standing for fractional restitution of corporate shares under § 3 Abs. 1 Satz 5 VermG and rebuttal of the expropriation presumption
8 B 33/16, 8 B 33/16 (8 C 1/17)
Eligibility for fractional restitution of foreign-listed shares under the Act on the Removal of the Consequences of National Socialist Persecution
8 B 68/16, 8 B 68/16 (8 C 10/17)
Scope of fractional restitution for expropriated company shares with assets in reunification area: object-less beneficiary determination versus specific asset claims
8 B 1/15
Extent of fractional restitution under the Property Restoration Act for post-expropriation acquisitions by the expropriated entity

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for the verdict, as the court explicitly ordered the admission of the revision based on fundamental legal significance under this provision.

§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG

Procedural provision cited in the second order for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Procedural provision cited in the second order for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Procedural provision cited in the second order for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Voraussetzungen der Bruchteilsrestitution

[GRUENDE]

Die zulässige Beschwerde der Beklagten ist begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren bietet voraussichtlich Gelegenheit, die Voraussetzungen einer Bruchteilsrestitution nach § 3 Abs. 1 Satz 4 Halbs. 2 VermG näher zu präzisieren und insbesondere zu klären, ob ein Anspruch auf Bruchteilsrestitution wegen verfolgungsbedingt entzogener Anteile an Unternehmen mit Sitz außerhalb des Beitrittsgebiets davon abhängig ist, dass die Rückerstattung nach "einem anderen nach dem 8. Mai 1945 ergangenen Gesetz" (vgl. § 3 Abs. 1 Satz 4 Halbs. 2 VermG) erfolgt ist.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.