Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
8 B 42/16, 8 B 42/16 (8 C 3/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:230117B8B42.16.0 Generato dall'IA

Entitlement to shareholdings in companies located outside the accession area under German property restitution law

Numero d'incarto 8 B 42/16, 8 B 42/16 (8 C 3/17)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court granted the defendant's complaint for leave to appeal, ruling that the higher court appeal is admissible based on fundamental legal significance, thereby allowing the case to proceed to the full appellate court. The dispute concerns a claim for an entitlement to shareholdings in companies, specifically challenging whether such an entitlement can be established for entities that were located outside the area of accession at the time of the damage under German property restitution law. The decision relies on §§ 1(6) and 3(1) sentence 4 second half-sentence of the Property Reconstruction Act (VermG), determining that the question of the temporal and geographic scope of restitution rights regarding post-accession shareholdings requires clarification by the Federal Administrative Court.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 GKG, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Entitlement to shareholdings in companies located outside the accession area under German property restitution law: The dispute concerns a claim for an entitlement to shareholdings in companies, specifically challenging whether such an entitlement can be established for entities that were located outside the area of accession at the time of the damage under German property restitution law. The decision relies on §§ 1(6) and 3(1) sentence 4 second half-sentence of the Property Reconstruction Act (VermG), determining that the question of the temporal and geographic scope of restitution rights regarding post-accession shareholdings requires clarification by the Federal Administrative Court.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
restituzione della proprietà diritto di proprietà persona giuridica diritto all'indennizzo ampliamento dell'espropriazione reclamo amministrativo

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Cited as the main ground for allowing the appeal due to fundamental significance.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Cited as the legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appellate proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG
Cited as the legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appellate proceedings.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Cited as the legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appellate proceedings.
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Cited as the main ground for allowing the appeal due to fundamental significance.

§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG

Cited as the legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appellate proceedings.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Cited as the legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appellate proceedings.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Cited as the legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appellate proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Berechtigung für Beteiligungen an Unternehmen

[GRUENDE]

Die zulässige Beschwerde der Beklagten ist begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren bietet voraussichtlich Gelegenheit zu klären, ob auf der Grundlage von § 1 Abs. 6, § 3 Abs. 1 Satz 4 Halbs. 2 VermG die Berechtigung für Beteiligungen an Unternehmen festgestellt werden kann, die zum Zeitpunkt der Schädigung ihren Sitz außerhalb des Beitrittsgebiets hatten.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.