Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
8 B 33/16, 8 B 33/16 (8 C 1/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:190117B8B33.16.0 Generato dall'IA

Eligibility for fractional restitution of foreign-listed shares under the Act on the Removal of the Consequences of National Socialist Persecution

Numero d'incarto 8 B 33/16, 8 B 33/16 (8 C 1/17)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted leave to appeal the defendant's complaint, overturning the lower court's decision not to admit the revision, thereby allowing the case to proceed to the appellate stage where the substantive merits will be decided. The dispute concerned a claim for compensation under the Act on the Removal of the Consequences of National Socialist Persecution (VermG), specifically regarding shares in a stock corporation sold in 1942 to settle the Jewish Property Levy; the plaintiff had claimed "fractional restitution" (Bruchteilsrestitution) for these assets, which the administrative authority rejected and the lower administrative court had reversed by ordering the defendant to acknowledge the plaintiff's entitlement to the nominal value of the shares. The BVerwG found the revision admissible under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO due to the fundamental legal question of whether a claim for fractional restitution of assets lost to persecution in companies located outside the territory of accession is contingent upon restitution occurring under a different law enacted after May 8, 1945, as stipulated in § 3 Abs. 1 Satz 4 Halbs. 1 and 2 VermG.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 GKG, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Eligibility for fractional restitution of foreign-listed shares under the Act on the Removal of the Consequences of National Socialist Persecution: The dispute concerned a claim for compensation under the Act on the Removal of the Consequences of National Socialist Persecution (VermG), specifically regarding shares in a stock corporation sold in 1942 to settle the Jewish Property Levy; the plaintiff had claimed "fractional restitution" (Bruchteilsrestitution) for these assets, which the administrative authority rejected and the lower administrative court had reversed by ordering the defendant to acknowledge the plaintiff's entitlement to the nominal value of the shares. The BVerwG found the revision admissible under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO due to the fundamental legal question of whether a claim for fractional restitution of assets lost to persecution in companies located outside the territory of accession is contingent upon restitution occurring under a different law enacted after May 8, 1945, as stipulated in § 3 Abs. 1 Satz 4 Halbs. 1 and 2 VermG.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
restituzione della proprietà regime di risarcimento diritto estero valore litigioso accertamento della persecuzione società estera

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for the verdict, cited in the dispositive to justify granting leave to appeal due to the fundamental legal significance of the case.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Procedural rule applied in the dispositive for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute.
§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG
Procedural rule applied in the dispositive for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for the appeal proceedings.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Procedural rule applied in the dispositive for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute.
Generato dall'IA
8 B 48/16, 8 B 48/16 (8 C 2/17)
Prerequisites for fractional restitution of expropriated corporate shares under § 3 Abs. 1 Satz 4 Halbs. 2 VermG
8 B 106/09
Standing for fractional restitution of corporate shares under § 3 Abs. 1 Satz 5 VermG and rebuttal of the expropriation presumption
8 B 105/09
Restitution eligibility for corporate shareholders under German asset restitution law
8 C 10/16
Prerequisite of prior restitution for fractional restitution claims based on expropriation of Western shareholdings in holding companies with assets in the accession area
8 B 17/13
Scope of supplementary restitution under § 3 Abs. 1 Satz 4 VermG for indirect shareholdings where post-war share return constituted sustainable reparation of NS-era deprivation

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for the verdict, cited in the dispositive to justify granting leave to appeal due to the fundamental legal significance of the case.

§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG

Procedural rule applied in the dispositive for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for the appeal proceedings.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Procedural rule applied in the dispositive for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Procedural rule applied in the dispositive for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Voraussetzungen der Bruchteilsrestitution

[GRUENDE]

Die Klägerin macht vermögensrechtliche Ansprüche wegen eines Verkaufs von Anteilen des Dr. G an der I.G. F. AG geltend. Dr. G verkaufte die genannten Anteile mit einem Nominalwert von 880 000 RM im April 1942, um die ihm gegenüber festgesetzte Judenvermögensabgabe zu begleichen. Zu einer Rückerstattung der Anteile oder der Zuerkennung eines Schadensersatzes wegen des Verkaufs der Anteile nach Rückerstattungsrecht ist es nicht gekommen. Allerdings wurde den Erben nach Dr. G ein Schadensersatzanspruch wegen der bezahlten Judenvermögensabgabe und anderer Vermögensverluste zuerkannt. Im September 2006 meldete die Klägerin die Beteiligung des Dr. G an der I.G. F. AG und deren Besitz an und beschränkte ihren Anspruch auf Entschädigung. Die Beklagte lehnte den Antrag mit Bescheid vom 26. August 2013 ab. Das Verwaltungsgericht hat die Beklagte verpflichtet, die Berechtigung der Klägerin hinsichtlich der Beteiligung von Dr. G an der I.G. F. AG in Höhe von nominell 880 000 RM festzustellen. Es hat die Revision nicht zugelassen.

Die zulässige Beschwerde der Beklagten ist begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren bietet voraussichtlich Gelegenheit, die Voraussetzungen einer Bruchteilsrestitution nach § 3 Abs. 1 Satz 4 Halbs. 2 VermG näher zu präzisieren und insbesondere zu klären, ob ein Anspruch auf Bruchteilsrestitution wegen verfolgungsbedingt entzogener Anteile an Unternehmen mit Sitz außerhalb des Beitrittsgebiets davon abhängig ist, dass die Rückerstattung nach "einem anderen nach dem 8. Mai 1945 ergangenen Gesetz" (vgl. § 3 Abs. 1 Satz 4 Halbs. 1 VermG) erfolgt ist.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.