Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
8 B 43/16, 8 B 43/16 (8 C 4/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:230117B8B43.16.0 Generato dall'IA

Admission of revision on entitlement to foreign-seated business participations under German restitution law

Numero d'incarto 8 B 43/16, 8 B 43/16 (8 C 4/17)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court granted the defendant's complaint and ordered the admission of an appeal on points of law, effectively allowing the case to proceed to the Revision bench. The dispute concerned a property restitution claim under the German Restitution and Compensation Act (VermG), specifically challenging the lower court's treatment of eligibility for participation interests in companies that were situated outside the accession territory at the time of the expropriation or seizure. The court found the appeal admissible due to the matter's fundamental legal significance, as it requires clarification on whether § 1 Abs. 6 and § 3 Abs. 1 Satz 4 Halbs. 2 VermG permit the determination of entitlement to business participations for entities with a foreign seat during the relevant period.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 GKG, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Admission of revision on entitlement to foreign-seated business participations under German restitution law: The dispute concerned a property restitution claim under the German Restitution and Compensation Act (VermG), specifically challenging the lower court's treatment of eligibility for participation interests in companies that were situated outside the accession territory at the time of the expropriation or seizure. The court found the appeal admissible due to the matter's fundamental legal significance, as it requires clarification on whether § 1 Abs. 6 and § 3 Abs. 1 Satz 4 Halbs. 2 VermG permit the determination of entitlement to business participations for entities with a foreign seat during the relevant period.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
restituzione della proprietà diritto estero revisione di una decisione diritto all'indennizzo società estera oggetto della lite

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for the verdict, as it explicitly justifies the admission of the revision due to fundamental significance in the operative part of the decision.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Procedural rule applied in the dispositive for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG
Procedural rule applied in the dispositive for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Procedural rule applied in the dispositive for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for the verdict, as it explicitly justifies the admission of the revision due to fundamental significance in the operative part of the decision.

§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG

Procedural rule applied in the dispositive for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Procedural rule applied in the dispositive for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Procedural rule applied in the dispositive for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Berechtigung für Beteiligungen an Unternehmen

[GRUENDE]

Die zulässige Beschwerde der Beklagten ist begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren bietet voraussichtlich Gelegenheit zu klären, ob auf der Grundlage von § 1 Abs. 6, § 3 Abs. 1 Satz 4 Halbs. 2 VermG die Berechtigung für Beteiligungen an Unternehmen festgestellt werden kann, die zum Zeitpunkt der Schädigung ihren Sitz außerhalb des Beitrittsgebiets hatten.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.