Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 B 112/16, 1 B 112/16 (1 C 36/16) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2016:011216B1B112.16.0 Generato dall'IA

Timing of language proficiency requirement for subsequent inclusion of resident spouse in asylum admission decision

Numero d'incarto 1 B 112/16, 1 B 112/16 (1 C 36/16)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted leave to appeal (Revisionszulassung) on grounds of fundamental significance, thereby allowing the plaintiff to proceed to the next instance regarding the challenge to a spouse's inclusion in a residence permit. The dispute concerned whether a spouse already residing in Germany must possess basic German language skills at the time of subsequent inclusion in the initial admission decision (Aufnahmebescheid). The court identified the open legal question under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO as determining the specific point in time when such language proficiency requirements under § 27 Abs. 2 Satz 1 BVFG must be fulfilled for a spouse included in an existing permit.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 2 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG; Timing of language proficiency requirement for subsequent inclusion of resident spouse in asylum admission decision: The dispute concerned whether a spouse already residing in Germany must possess basic German language skills at the time of subsequent inclusion in the initial admission decision (Aufnahmebescheid). The court identified the open legal question under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO as determining the specific point in time when such language proficiency requirements under § 27 Abs. 2 Satz 1 BVFG must be fulfilled for a spouse included in an existing permit.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
revisione in materia d'asilo obbligo di residenza permesso di dimora competenze linguistiche coniuge motivi di revisione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for the verdict, cited in the dispositive to authorize the appeal for revision due to the fundamental importance of the legal issue.
§ 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 2 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 2 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Procedural provision cited in the dispositive to determine the legal basis for the temporary assessment of the amount in dispute.
Generato dall'IA
1 C 36/16
Late resettlement hardship inclusion: requirement of basic German language skills at time of entry and scope of special hardship
10 C 12/12
Spouse reunion for German citizens: Constitutional interpretation of pre-entry language requirements under § 30 Abs. 1 Nr. 2 AufenthG
1 C 8/09
Family reunification: validity of pre-entry language requirement and inapplicability of EU nationality non-discrimination to third-country nationals
1 B 35/21
Eligibility for derived family protection based on "own right" status and constitutionality of immediate filing requirement for spouses under German Asylum Act
2 BvR 1413/10
Family reunification visa refusal based on mandatory pre-entry German language proficiency

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for the verdict, cited in the dispositive to authorize the appeal for revision due to the fundamental importance of the legal issue.

§ 47 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 2 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG

Procedural provision cited in the dispositive to determine the legal basis for the temporary assessment of the amount in dispute.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Anforderungen an die nachträgliche Einbeziehung des in Deutschland lebenden Ehegatten in einen Aufnahmebescheid

[GRUENDE]

Die bei sachdienlicher Auslegung auf die Einbeziehung des Ehemannes beschränkte Beschwerde ist zulässig und begründet.

Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit geben zu klären, zu welchem Zeitpunkt bei der nachträglichen Einbeziehung in einen Aufnahmebescheid ein bereits in Deutschland lebender Ehegatte Grundkenntnisse der deutschen Sprache im Sinne von § 27 Abs. 2 Satz 1 BVFG besitzen muss.

Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 2 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.