Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
4 B 35/16, 4 B 35/16 (4 C 8/16) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2016:141116B4B35.16.0 Generato dall'IA

Validity of a residential zoning plan excluding core uses under § 4(2) BauNVO while permitting general exceptions

Numero d'incarto 4 B 35/16, 4 B 35/16 (4 C 8/16)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court granted leave to appeal, finding the complaint well-founded and allowing the case to proceed to a full revision hearing. The dispute concerns the validity of a detailed development plan that excluded all residential uses permitted under § 4(2) nos. 2 and 3 of the Building Code (BauNVO) while generally permitting exceptions under § 4(3). The court identified a fundamental legal question of general significance regarding whether such a plan violates the general purpose of a general residential area under § 4 BauNVO by excluding core residential functions, thereby necessitating clarification in the upcoming revision proceedings.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Validity of a residential zoning plan excluding core uses under § 4(2) BauNVO while permitting general exceptions: The dispute concerns the validity of a detailed development plan that excluded all residential uses permitted under § 4(2) nos. 2 and 3 of the Building Code (BauNVO) while generally permitting exceptions under § 4(3). The court identified a fundamental legal question of general significance regarding whether such a plan violates the general purpose of a general residential area under § 4 BauNVO by excluding core residential functions, thereby necessitating clarification in the upcoming revision proceedings.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
violazione delle norme edilizie piano di costruzione casi di esclusione requisito di validità reclamo amministrativo zona soggetta a ulteriore pianificazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for granting leave to appeal (Revisionszulassung) due to fundamental legal significance.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute (Streitwertfestsetzung) for the revision proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
4 BN 10/21
Validity of excluding residential use in a mixed zone while permitting operational apartments as a counter-exception under BauNVO
4 C 8/16
Invalidity of zoning plan excluding all generally permitted uses from general residential area despite uplisting hospitality businesses
4 BN 11/21
Zoning Plan Validity: Combining Exclusion of Residential Use with Business Apartment Counter-Exception in Mixed-Use Area
4 CN 3/14
Validity of mixed zoning in a weekend-house area: compatibility of secured residential use with area character under § 10 BauNVO
4 BN 7/24, 4 BN 7/24 (4 CN 2/24)
Admissibility of zoning plan provisions limiting ground surface area requirements exclusively to main structures under § 16 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 BauNVO

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for granting leave to appeal (Revisionszulassung) due to fundamental legal significance.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute (Streitwertfestsetzung) for the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Gültigkeit eines Bebauungsplans bei Ausschluss von Nutzungen nach § 4 BauNVO

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann voraussichtlich zur Klärung der grundsätzlich bedeutsamen Rechtsfrage beitragen, ob ein Bebauungsplan die allgemeine Zweckbestimmung eines allgemeinen Wohngebiets nach § 4 BauNVO wahrt, wenn in ihm alle zulässigen Nutzungen nach § 4 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 und 3 BauNVO ausgeschlossen, ausnahmsweise nach § 4 Abs. 3 BauNVO zulässige Nutzungen aber allgemein zugelassen werden.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.