Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
3 B 55/15, 3 B 55/15 (3 C 22/16) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2016:280916B3B55.15.0 Generato dall'IA

Legal limits on arbitration boards’ setting of hospital-specific daily fees under the Hospital Remuneration Act

Numero d'incarto 3 B 55/15, 3 B 55/15 (3 C 22/16)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court permitted the appeal on the merits, finding that the case holds fundamental significance, thereby allowing the appellate review of the arbitration board's decision to proceed. The dispute concerned the statutory limits on the competence of a medical arbitration board (Schiedsstelle) when determining hospital-specific daily fees under the Hospital Remuneration Act. The decisive legal basis for the court's ruling is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which grants appeal permission due to the need to clarify the legal boundaries imposed by § 13 Abs. 1 Satz 2 and § 14 Abs. 1 Satz 2 in conjunction with § 6 Abs. 1 KHEntgG on the arbitration board's fee-setting authority.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 GKG; Legal limits on arbitration boards’ setting of hospital-specific daily fees under the Hospital Remuneration Act: The dispute concerned the statutory limits on the competence of a medical arbitration board (Schiedsstelle) when determining hospital-specific daily fees under the Hospital Remuneration Act. The decisive legal basis for the court's ruling is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which grants appeal permission due to the need to clarify the legal boundaries imposed by § 13 Abs. 1 Satz 2 and § 14 Abs. 1 Satz 2 in conjunction with § 6 Abs. 1 KHEntgG on the arbitration board's fee-setting authority.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
arbitrato limiti legali spese legali limiti della competenza autorità amministrativa motivo di revisione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Legal basis for the main ground of the verdict, establishing that the case has fundamental significance and justifying the permission of the appeal on the merits.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Procedural rule applied for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG
Procedural rule applied for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Legal basis for the main ground of the verdict, establishing that the case has fundamental significance and justifying the permission of the appeal on the merits.

§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG

Procedural rule applied for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Procedural rule applied for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Grenzpräzisierung für Schiedsstellen bei Festsetzungen von Entgelten

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Beigeladenen hat Erfolg. Die Rechtssache hat grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne von § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO. Das Revisionsverfahren wird dem Senat voraussichtlich Gelegenheit geben, die rechtlichen Grenzen zu präzisieren, denen die Schiedsstelle nach § 13 Abs. 1 Satz 2, § 14 Abs. 1 Satz 2 des Krankenhausentgeltgesetzes (KHEntgG) bei der Entscheidung über die Festsetzung krankenhausindividueller tagesbezogener Entgelte gemäß § 6 Abs. 1 KHEntgG unterliegt.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.