Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 B 111/15, 2 B 111/15 (2 C 27/16) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2016:200916B2B111.15.0 Generato dall'IA

Compensation of foreign standby duty via leisure time: fundamental significance of valuation rules for Revisionszulassung under § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO

Numero d'incarto 2 B 111/15, 2 B 111/15 (2 C 27/16)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court ordered the admission of the plaintiff’s appeal, ruling in his favor on the procedural question of legal significance. The dispute concerned the valuation of additional work performed in the form of standby duty, specifically regarding its compensation through leisure time for duties performed abroad. The court determined that the case presented fundamental legal questions regarding the compensation of such standby work, particularly in the context of international service, thereby satisfying the requirements for appellate jurisdiction under § 132 (2) No. 1 of the Administrative Court Rules.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1, 2 und 3 GKG; Compensation of foreign standby duty via leisure time: fundamental significance of valuation rules for Revisionszulassung under § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO: The dispute concerned the valuation of additional work performed in the form of standby duty, specifically regarding its compensation through leisure time for duties performed abroad. The court determined that the case presented fundamental legal questions regarding the compensation of such standby work, particularly in the context of international service, thereby satisfying the requirements for appellate jurisdiction under § 132 (2) No. 1 of the Administrative Court Rules.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
durata legale del lavoro regime di risarcimento dovere procedurale ferie non retribuite diritto estero valore in dogana

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for admitting the appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1, 2 und 3 GKG
Basis for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for the appeal proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
2 B 113/15, 2 B 113/15 (2 C 28/16)
Compensation of on-call duty excess work via leisure time: legal treatment of service performed abroad
2 B 112/15, 2 B 112/15 (2 C 23/15)
Compensatory leisure time for overseas on-call duty: Admissibility of revision due to fundamental legal significance
2 B 114/15, 2 B 114/15 (2 C 26/16)
Compensation of foreign on-call service as overwork offset by leisure time in public service
2 C 21/15
Full one-to-one leisure time compensation for ordered police standby duty under § 88 Satz 2 BBG
2 C 22/15
Compensatory leave ratio for standby duty under German civil service law and EU Working Time Directive

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for admitting the appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1, 2 und 3 GKG

Basis for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for the appeal proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; durch Freizeit auszugleichende Mehrarbeit in Form von Bereitschaftsdienst insbesondere bei einer Dienstleistung im Ausland

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision des Klägers ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit zur Klärung von Fragen geben, die sich im Zusammenhang mit durch Freizeit auszugleichender Mehrarbeit in Form von Bereitschaftsdienst stellen. Dies betrifft insbesondere die bei einer Dienstleistung im Ausland erbrachte Mehrarbeit. Zu diesen Fragen sind beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht weitere Revisionen anhängig (Verfahren BVerwG 2 C 21.15 bis 2 C 24.15, 2 C 28.15 und 2 C 3.16).

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1, 2 und 3 GKG und entspricht der Streitwertfestsetzung des Berufungsgerichts.