Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 B 113/15, 2 B 113/15 (2 C 28/16) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2016:200916B2B113.15.0 Generato dall'IA

Compensation of on-call duty excess work via leisure time: legal treatment of service performed abroad

Numero d'incarto 2 B 113/15, 2 B 113/15 (2 C 28/16)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court ordered the admission of the plaintiff's appeal on points of law, resulting in the plaintiff prevailing at this procedural stage, as the court determined the case possessed fundamental legal significance requiring clarification. The dispute concerns the calculation and compensation of excess work performed as on-call duty (Bereitschaftsdienst), which must be compensated by leisure time rather than monetary payment, specifically raising issues regarding how such obligations are handled when the service is performed abroad. The decision relies on § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO for the legal basis to admit the appeal due to the general importance of the questions involved, while the provisional value in dispute is set according to § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 in conjunction with § 52 Abs. 1, 2, and 3 GKG.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1, 2 und 3 GKG; Compensation of on-call duty excess work via leisure time: legal treatment of service performed abroad: The dispute concerns the calculation and compensation of excess work performed as on-call duty (Bereitschaftsdienst), which must be compensated by leisure time rather than monetary payment, specifically raising issues regarding how such obligations are handled when the service is performed abroad. The decision relies on § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO for the legal basis to admit the appeal due to the general importance of the questions involved, while the provisional value in dispute is set according to § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 in conjunction with § 52 Abs. 1, 2, and 3 GKG.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
servizio di picchetto compenso per prestazioni dovere procedurale durata legale del lavoro diritto delle obbligazioni valore litigioso

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Serves as the main legal ground for admitting the appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal issues raised.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1, 2 und 3 GKG
Applied to determine the provisional value in dispute for the proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
2 B 112/15, 2 B 112/15 (2 C 23/15)
Compensatory leisure time for overseas on-call duty: Admissibility of revision due to fundamental legal significance
2 B 114/15, 2 B 114/15 (2 C 26/16)
Compensation of foreign on-call service as overwork offset by leisure time in public service
2 B 115/15, 2 B 115/15 (2 C 22/15)
Overtime compensation for on-call duty performed abroad
2 B 111/15, 2 B 111/15 (2 C 27/16)
Compensation of foreign standby duty via leisure time: fundamental significance of valuation rules for Revisionszulassung under § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO
2 B 116/15, 2 B 116/15 (2 C 24/15)
Compensation for on-call duty overtime performed abroad

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Serves as the main legal ground for admitting the appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal issues raised.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1, 2 und 3 GKG

Applied to determine the provisional value in dispute for the proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; durch Freizeit auszugleichende Mehrarbeit in Form von Bereitschaftsdienst insbesondere bei einer Dienstleistung im Ausland

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision des Klägers ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit zur Klärung von Fragen geben, die sich im Zusammenhang mit durch Freizeit auszugleichender Mehrarbeit in Form von Bereitschaftsdienst stellen. Dies betrifft insbesondere die bei einer Dienstleistung im Ausland erbrachte Mehrarbeit. Zu diesen Fragen sind beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht weitere Revisionen anhängig (Verfahren BVerwG 2 C 21.15 bis 2 C 24.15, 2 C 28.15 und 2 C 3.16).

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1, 2 und 3 GKG und entspricht der Streitwertfestsetzung des Berufungsgerichts.