Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
5 B 6/16, 5 B 6/16 (5 C 17/16) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2016:060916B5B6.16.0 Generato dall'IA

Compatibility of Lower Saxony Supplementary Allowances Regulation § 17(7) with superior law

Numero d'incarto 5 B 6/16, 5 B 6/16 (5 C 17/16)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) admitted the plaintiff's revision and permitted the appeal, ruling that the legal issue possessed fundamental significance. The dispute concerned a challenge to the compatibility of § 17(7) sentence 1 of the Lower Saxony Supplementary Allowances Regulation (NBhVO) of November 7, 2011, with superior law. The decisive legal basis for the decision is § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO, which governs the admission of revision on grounds of fundamental legal significance, enabling the appellate court to examine whether the contested regulation on medical supplementary allowances aligns with higher-ranking legal norms.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Compatibility of Lower Saxony Supplementary Allowances Regulation § 17(7) with superior law: The dispute concerned a challenge to the compatibility of § 17(7) sentence 1 of the Lower Saxony Supplementary Allowances Regulation (NBhVO) of November 7, 2011, with superior law. The decisive legal basis for the decision is § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO, which governs the admission of revision on grounds of fundamental legal significance, enabling the appellate court to examine whether the contested regulation on medical supplementary allowances aligns with higher-ranking legal norms.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
pena complementare motivi di revisione impugnazione di decisioni amministrative ravvicinamento delle legislazioni ambito d'applicazione ratione materiae dei regolamenti disposizioni speciali per il Lussemburgo

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.
Generato dall'IA
5 B 66/12
Validity of administrative application under the Compensation Law and scope of analogical application to the Investment Priority Act
2 B 94/09
Legality requirement for statutory delegation of official assistance cost-deduction flat rates and prohibition of retroactive annualization
IV ZR 85/20
Validity of Sanierungsgelder for capital-funded supplementary pension funds and scope of judicial review under § 315 BGB
9 B 71/11
Sufficiency of appeal justification referencing prior provisional orders and exclusion of objective legal arbitrariness from procedural error
4 C 23/13
Sanierungsrechtliche Ausgleichsbeträge: Anknüpfung der Festsetzungsfrist an formellen Abschluss statt Treu und Glauben

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Klärung der Frage, ob § 17 Abs. 7 Satz 1 der Niedersächsischen Beihilfeverordnung mit höherrangigem Recht in Einklang steht

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Klägers ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, ob die Bestimmung des § 17 Abs. 7 Satz 1 der Niedersächsischen Beihilfeverordnung (NBhVO) vom 7. November 2011 (Nds. GVBl. S. 372) mit höherrangigem Recht in Einklang steht.