Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
9 B 62/15, 9 B 62/15 (9 C 12/16) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2016:210716B9B62.15.0 Generato dall'IA

Admissibility of revision to clarify remuneration standards for procedural representatives under § 119 Abs. 3 FlurbG

Numero d'incarto 9 B 62/15, 9 B 62/15 (9 C 12/16)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court allowed the defendant's appeal, granting leave for a revision proceeding to address the unresolved legal standard for remuneration of procedural representatives in land consolidation cases. The dispute concerned the interpretation of § 119 Abs. 3 of the Land Consolidation Act (FlurbG), specifically regarding the criteria for calculating fees for representatives in these proceedings. The court determined that the issue possesses fundamental significance as it has not previously been clarified by the Federal Administrative Court, and it fixed the provisional value in dispute for the revision instance pursuant to §§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, 52 Abs. 3, and 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 of the Court Costs Act (GKG).

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Admissibility of revision to clarify remuneration standards for procedural representatives under § 119 Abs. 3 FlurbG: The dispute concerned the interpretation of § 119 Abs. 3 of the Land Consolidation Act (FlurbG), specifically regarding the criteria for calculating fees for representatives in these proceedings. The court determined that the issue possesses fundamental significance as it has not previously been clarified by the Federal Administrative Court, and it fixed the provisional value in dispute for the revision instance pursuant to §§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, 52 Abs. 3, and 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 of the Court Costs Act (GKG).

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
revisione processuale spese legali valore litigioso violazione delle forme sostanziali adattamento delle retribuzioni revisione della rendita invalidità

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for the verdict, as it justifies the allowance of the revision appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Procedural basis cited in the dispositive for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceeding.
Generato dall'IA
9 BN 4/13, 9 BN 4/13 (9 CN 1/14)
Admissibility of revision to develop jurisprudence on binding effect of land readjustment plan determinations
B 5 RS 40/15 B
Admissibility of revision for general significance: classification of wage data determination proceedings under § 6 AAÜG as property right disputes under § 287 Abs. 2 ZPO
5 B 15/11
Admission of revision for fundamental significance of resuming administrative compensation proceedings after jurisprudential change
1 A 7/15
Admissibility of Nichtigkeits- und Restitutionsantrag against final procedural orders dismissing revision
VI B 53/15
Admissibility of revision for unity of case law requiring decisive legal principle and comparable facts; exclusion of hypothetical reasoning and unrelated-year evidence from procedural error review

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for the verdict, as it justifies the allowance of the revision appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Procedural basis cited in the dispositive for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceeding.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Vergütung des Verfahrensvertreters nach § 119 Abs. 3 FlurbG

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Beklagten ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Senat Gelegenheit geben, über den vom Bundesverwaltungsgericht bisher nicht geklärten Maßstab für die Vergütung des Verfahrensvertreters gemäß § 119 Abs. 3 FlurbG zu entscheiden.

Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwertes für das Revisionsverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.