Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
5 PB 30/15, 5 PB 30/15 (5 P 2/16) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2016:040416B5PB30.15.0 Generato dall'IA

Scope of "centrally administered IT procedures" under SGB II: inclusion of hardware in personnel status classification

Numero d'incarto 5 PB 30/15, 5 PB 30/15 (5 P 2/16)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Social Court admitted the applicant's complaint to clarify a question of fundamental legal importance, leaving the outcome of the underlying dispute pending on remand. The case concerns a service law administrative proceeding under the Federal Personnel Act, specifically challenging the interpretation of "centrally administered information technology procedures" within the context of § 50 Abs. 3 SGB II. The court ordered a review to determine whether this statutory term encompasses only software components or also extends to hardware, a definition that remains unresolved at this procedural stage.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 50 Abs. 3 SGB 2, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG, § 50 Abs. 3 SGB II; Scope of "centrally administered IT procedures" under SGB II: inclusion of hardware in personnel status classification: Die Rechtsbeschwerde des Antragstellers ist gemäß § 83 Abs. 2 BPersVG i.V.m. § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG wegen einer entscheidungserheblichen Rechtsfrage von grundsätzlicher Bedeutung zuzulassen.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
posizioni amministrative decisioni incidentali potere di cognizione statuto giuridico interpretazione del diritto questione di principio

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 50 Abs. 3 SGB 2
Zulassung der Rechtsbeschwerde; Begriff der zentral verwalteten IT-Verfahren in § 50 Abs. 3 SGB 2
§ 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG
1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG wegen einer entscheidungserheblichen Rechtsfrage von grundsätzlicher Bedeutung zuzulassen.
§ 50 Abs. 3 SGB II
Die Rechtssache kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, ob der Begriff der zentral verwalteten Verfahren der Informationstechnik im Sinne von § 50 Abs. 3 SGB II nicht nur entsprechende Software, sondern auch Hardware erfasst.
Generato dall'IA
5 P 2/16
Co-determination rights exclude centrally managed hardware under SGB II information technology procedures
5 PB 19/18
Exclusion of works council co-determination for centrally managed IT systems under § 50 Abs. 3 SGB II
7 ABR 39/16
Scope of job center's duty to consult local severely disabled employees' representatives on centrally managed IT systems
B 14 AS 39/13 R
SGB II benefit review: requirement for specific identification of administrative acts and temporal reference point for evaluating the sufficiency of a § 44 SGB X application
B 12 KR 2/21 B
Insured employment status of IT consultant; admissibility of complaint challenging non-admission of revision based on procedural flaw

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Zulassung der Rechtsbeschwerde; Begriff der zentral verwalteten IT-Verfahren in § 50 Abs. 3 SGB 2

[GRUENDE]

Die Rechtsbeschwerde des Antragstellers ist gemäß § 83 Abs. 2 BPersVG i.V.m. § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG wegen einer entscheidungserheblichen Rechtsfrage von grundsätzlicher Bedeutung zuzulassen.

Die Rechtssache kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, ob der Begriff der zentral verwalteten Verfahren der Informationstechnik im Sinne von § 50 Abs. 3 SGB II nicht nur entsprechende Software, sondern auch Hardware erfasst.