Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
3 B 21/15, 3 B 21/15 (3 C 3/16) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2016:030216B3B21.15.0 Generato dall'IA

Definition of "Zugehörigkeit" to East German supplementary pension systems under the Vocational Rehabilitation Act

Numero d'incarto 3 B 21/15, 3 B 21/15 (3 C 3/16)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court granted the plaintiff's leave to appeal, ruling that the case possesses fundamental legal significance and setting the minimum amount in dispute for the subsequent revision proceedings. The dispute concerned the plaintiff's application for the legal concept of "Zugehörigkeit" (affiliation) to an East German supplementary or special pension system under the Vocational Rehabilitation Act (BerRehaG). By admitting the appeal, the court indicated it will use the revision proceedings to precisely define this legal term, while determining that the plaintiff's potential economic benefit is low, thereby justifying the application of the minimum statutory amount in dispute.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 34 Abs. 1 Satz 3 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, Anlage 2 zu § 34 Abs. 1 Satz 3 GKG; Definition of "Zugehörigkeit" to East German supplementary pension systems under the Vocational Rehabilitation Act: The dispute concerned the plaintiff's application for the legal concept of "Zugehörigkeit" (affiliation) to an East German supplementary or special pension system under the Vocational Rehabilitation Act (BerRehaG). By admitting the appeal, the court indicated it will use the revision proceedings to precisely define this legal term, while determining that the plaintiff's potential economic benefit is low, thereby justifying the application of the minimum statutory amount in dispute.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
riabilitazione professionale revisione della rendita pensione complementare prestazione statutaria domanda di revisione congedo straordinario

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Basis for granting leave to appeal due to the fundamental significance of the case.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 34 Abs. 1 Satz 3 GKG
Die Festsetzung des Mindeststreitwertes nach Anlage 2 zu § 34 Abs. 1 Satz 3 GKG ist angemessen, weil die wirtschaftlichen Auswirkungen eines Erfolgs des Revisionsverfahrens für den Kläger voraussichtlich gering sind.
§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Provisions used to determine the provisional amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Anlage 2 zu § 34 Abs. 1 Satz 3 GKG
Basis for setting the minimum amount in dispute due to the expected low economic impact.
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Basis for granting leave to appeal due to the fundamental significance of the case.

§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Provisions used to determine the provisional amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Anlage 2 zu § 34 Abs. 1 Satz 3 GKG

Basis for setting the minimum amount in dispute due to the expected low economic impact.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Begriff "Zugehörigkeit" i.S.d. BerRehaG

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde hat Erfolg. Der Rechtssache kommt die von dem Kläger geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung zu (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO).

Das Revisionsverfahren wird dem Senat voraussichtlich Gelegenheit geben, den Begriff der "Zugehörigkeit" zu einem Zusatz- oder Sonderversorgungssystem der DDR im Sinne des Beruflichen Rehabilitierungsgesetzes zu präzisieren.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG. Die Festsetzung des Mindeststreitwertes nach Anlage 2 zu § 34 Abs. 1 Satz 3 GKG ist angemessen, weil die wirtschaftlichen Auswirkungen eines Erfolgs des Revisionsverfahrens für den Kläger voraussichtlich gering sind.