Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
4 BN 27/14, 4 BN 27/14 (4 CN 1/16) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2016:280116B4BN27.14.0 Generato dall'IA

Obligation to re-expose land-use plan draft and re-consult stakeholders when environmental report is amended post-participation

Numero d'incarto 4 BN 27/14, 4 BN 27/14 (4 CN 1/16)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court granted leave to appeal, reversing the lower court's implicit refusal and directing that the case proceed to revision due to its fundamental significance. The dispute concerned municipal planning law, specifically whether a municipality is legally obligated to re-expose the draft of a detailed land-use plan for public and authority consultation under the Building Code if the accompanying environmental report is modified after the initial participation phases have concluded. The decisive legal basis involves §§ 132(1), 133(1), and 132(2)(1) of the Administrative Court Rules (VwGO), combined with §§ 4a(3) sentence 1 and 3(2) of the Building Code (BauGB), establishing the procedural requirements for revisiting planning documents when environmental assessments are amended.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 133 Abs. 1 VwGO, § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 4a Abs. 3 Satz 1 BauGB, § 3 Abs. 2 BauGB, § 4 Abs. 2 BauGB, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Obligation to re-expose land-use plan draft and re-consult stakeholders when environmental report is amended post-participation: The dispute concerned municipal planning law, specifically whether a municipality is legally obligated to re-expose the draft of a detailed land-use plan for public and authority consultation under the Building Code if the accompanying environmental report is modified after the initial participation phases have concluded. The decisive legal basis involves §§ 132(1), 133(1), and 132(2)(1) of the Administrative Court Rules (VwGO), combined with §§ 4a(3) sentence 1 and 3(2) of the Building Code (BauGB), establishing the procedural requirements for revisiting planning documents when environmental assessments are amended.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
motivi di revisione diritto fondiario revisione del piano regolatore terreno comunale obbligo di costruire presupposto processuale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 133 Abs. 1 VwGO
1, § 133 Abs. 1 VwGO zulässige Beschwerde ist begründet.
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for granting leave to appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.
§ 4a Abs. 3 Satz 1 BauGB
§ 3 Abs. 2 BauGB
3 Satz 1 BauGB erneut auszulegen und die Stellungnahmen erneut einzuholen, wenn der dem Entwurf des Bebauungsplans beigefügte Umweltbericht nach der Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung gemäß § 3 Abs. 2 BauGB und der Behördenbeteiligung gemäß § 4 Abs.
§ 4 Abs. 2 BauGB
2 BauGB und der Behördenbeteiligung gemäß § 4 Abs. 2 BauGB geändert wird.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 132 Abs. 1, § 133 Abs. 1 VwGO
Procedural basis establishing the admissibility of the complaint against the refusal of leave to appeal.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Legal basis cited for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute (Streitwert) for the revision proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
4 BN 25/19
Obligation to Repeat Public Participation in Urban Planning After Amendment of Draft Development Plan
4 BN 46/21
Substantive effect of textual amendments to draft land-use plans: Mandatory re-consultation under § 4a Abs. 3 BauGB depends on regulatory content, not timing or pending litigation
4 B 41/15
Validity of regional land-use plan change challenged on failure to disclose environmental information in public notice
4 CN 1/16
Validity of zoning plan where environmental report amended after public participation: no obligation for re-exhibition under BauGB § 4a(3) or EU SEA Directive
4 BN 42/09
Reopening public participation when supplementary procedure substantively alters land-use plan with adverse effects

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for granting leave to appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.

§ 132 Abs. 1, § 133 Abs. 1 VwGO

Procedural basis establishing the admissibility of the complaint against the refusal of leave to appeal.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Legal basis cited for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute (Streitwert) for the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; erneute Auslegung des Bebauungsplans nach Änderung des Umweltberichts

[GRUENDE]

Die gemäß § 132 Abs. 1, § 133 Abs. 1 VwGO zulässige Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann zur weiteren Klärung der Frage beitragen, ob und gegebenenfalls unter welchen Voraussetzungen eine Gemeinde verpflichtet ist, den Entwurf eines Bebauungsplans gemäß § 4a Abs. 3 Satz 1 BauGB erneut auszulegen und die Stellungnahmen erneut einzuholen, wenn der dem Entwurf des Bebauungsplans beigefügte Umweltbericht nach der Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung gemäß § 3 Abs. 2 BauGB und der Behördenbeteiligung gemäß § 4 Abs. 2 BauGB geändert wird.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.