Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
3 B 24/15, 3 B 24/15 (3 C 2/16) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2016:120116B3B24.15.0 Generato dall'IA

Applicability of the favoring lesser statute of limitation principle under Article 2(2)(2) of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 to national limitation periods for sanctions

Numero d'incarto 3 B 24/15, 3 B 24/15 (3 C 2/16)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court granted leave to appeal, allowing the complainant to proceed to revision. The dispute concerns the applicability of EU Regulation No 2988/95 to national statutes of limitation governing sanctions. The decisive legal issue is whether the principle of favoring the less severe statute of limitation under Article 2, Paragraph 2, Sentence 2 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 applies to domestic limitation periods for sanctions, a question the court identified as having fundamental significance for clarification in the upcoming revision proceedings.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Applicability of the favoring lesser statute of limitation principle under Article 2(2)(2) of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 to national limitation periods for sanctions: Die Beschwerde hat Erfolg. Der Rechtssache kommt die geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung zu, § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO. Im Revisionsverfahren wird voraussichtlich insbesondere die Frage zu klären sein, ob das Günstigkeitsprinzip des Art. 2 Abs. 2 Satz 2 VO (EG, Euratom) Nr. 2988/95 auf Verjährungsvorschriften anzuwenden ist, die sich auf Sanktionen beziehen.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
termini sanzione amministrativa procedimento pregiudiziale applicabilità diretta diritto derivato portata della legge del contratto

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Der Rechtssache kommt die geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung zu, § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO.
Generato dall'IA
3 C 2/16
Retroactive Application of Milder Limitation Period for Agricultural Aid Sanctions: Whether Verjährungsregelungen Constitute Administrative Penalties under Regulation No. 2988/95
3 C 7/15
Applicability of EU Regulation 2988/95 limitation periods to union-law interest on agricultural subsidy recoupment
3 C 3/10
Limitation period for interest claims on EU storage cost compensation recovery under Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95
VIa ZR 1351/22
Non-acceptance of revision in tort claim: applicability of national limitation periods to EU-derived protective laws under § 823 Abs. 2 BGB
3 B 32/17, 3 B 32/17 (3 C 18/18)
Scope of the favorability principle for retroactive application of milder EU agricultural over-declaration sanctions

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Anwendbarkeit von Art. 2 Abs. 2 Satz 2 EGV 2988/95 (EG, Euratom) auf Verjährungsvorschriften

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde hat Erfolg. Der Rechtssache kommt die geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung zu, § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO. Im Revisionsverfahren wird voraussichtlich insbesondere die Frage zu klären sein, ob das Günstigkeitsprinzip des Art. 2 Abs. 2 Satz 2 VO (EG, Euratom) Nr. 2988/95 auf Verjährungsvorschriften anzuwenden ist, die sich auf Sanktionen beziehen.