Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
5 PB 17/15, 5 PB 17/15 (5 P 1/16) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2016:120116B5PB17.15.0 Generato dall'IA

Scope of works council co-determination rights when budget lacks funds for offsetting disadvantages

Numero d'incarto 5 PB 17/15, 5 PB 17/15 (5 P 1/16)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted the personnel council’s leave to appeal, finding that the case presents a legal question of fundamental importance requiring clarification. The dispute centers on whether the statutory co-determination and initiative rights of a works council under §§ 81(2)(9) and 83(1)(1) Saxon Personnel Representation Act (SächsPersVG) are excluded when the current service budget lacks specific funds in the social plan to offset disadvantages from intended measures, specifically in this context regarding severance payments. This decision allows the appeal to proceed to the Senate for a definitive ruling on the interaction between budgetary constraints and statutory employee representation rights.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG, § 88 Abs. 2 Satz 1 SächsPersVG, § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG; Scope of works council co-determination rights when budget lacks funds for offsetting disadvantages: The dispute centers on whether the statutory co-determination and initiative rights of a works council under §§ 81(2)(9) and 83(1)(1) Saxon Personnel Representation Act (SächsPersVG) are excluded when the current service budget lacks specific funds in the social plan to offset disadvantages from intended measures, specifically in this context regarding severance payments. This decision allows the appeal to proceed to the Senate for a definitive ruling on the interaction between budgetary constraints and statutory employee representation rights.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
diritti procedurali diritto al lavoro indennità una tantum diritti costituzionali specifici lavoro sociale attività sottoposta a contribuzione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG
Procedural provision cited in the dispositive regarding the requirements for admitting a legal appeal.
§ 88 Abs. 2 Satz 1 SächsPersVG
Procedural provision cited in the dispositive to grant leave to appeal for the personnel council.
§ 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG
Substantive basis cited in the dispositive justifying the admission of the appeal due to a legal question of fundamental importance.
Generato dall'IA
6 P 9/13
Scope of staff council co-determination in draft staffing plans: applicability of co-determination rights to budget personnel requirements regardless of staff increases
6 P 11/12
Unavailability of social plan co-determination for travel expense compensation due to exhaustive statutory and collective agreement regulations
5 P 1/16
Staff council’s right to initiate social plan negotiations despite budgetary objections
5 P 1/23
Scope of co-determination regarding discretionary pay scale assignments for collectively employed staff under § 88 Abs. 1 Nr. 4 HmbPersVG
6 P 6/12
Analogous application of staff council co-determination rights to activity restrictions of employee-like freelancers under German personnel representation law

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 88 Abs. 2 Satz 1 SächsPersVG

Procedural provision cited in the dispositive to grant leave to appeal for the personnel council.

§ 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG

Substantive basis cited in the dispositive justifying the admission of the appeal due to a legal question of fundamental importance.

§ 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG

Procedural provision cited in the dispositive regarding the requirements for admitting a legal appeal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Zulassung der Rechtsbeschwerde; Ausschluss des Mitbestimmungs- und Initiativrechts bei fehlenden Mitteln zum Nachteilsausgleich im Haushaltsplan

[GRUENDE]

Die Rechtsbeschwerde des Antragstellers ist gemäß § 88 Abs. 2 Satz 1 SächsPersVG i.V.m. § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG wegen einer entscheidungserheblichen Rechtsfrage von grundsätzlicher Bedeutung zuzulassen.

Die vorliegende Rechtssache kann dem Senat Gelegenheit geben, die Frage zu klären, ob das gesetzliche Mitbestimmungsrecht des Personalrates nach § 81 Abs. 2 Nr. 9 SächsPersVG und sein hierauf gerichtetes Initiativrecht nach § 83 Abs. 1 Satz 1 SächsPersVG ausgeschlossen sind, wenn der geltende Haushaltsplan der Dienststelle für die angestrebte Maßnahme (hier: Abfindungsleistungen) keine Mittel zum Nachteilsausgleich in einem Sozialplan vorsieht.