Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 B 68/14, 2 B 68/14 (2 C 28/15) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2015:101215B2B68.14.0 Generato dall'IA

Admission of appeal on points of law regarding temporal extent of compensatory leave for lawful on-call overtime

Numero d'incarto 2 B 68/14, 2 B 68/14 (2 C 28/15)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court ordered the admission of the plaintiff's appeal on points of law, thereby allowing the case to proceed to the Supreme level of judicial review, with the interim amount in dispute set equal to that of the prior instance. The dispute centers on the temporal extent of compensatory leave required to offset lawful overtime performed in the form of on-call duty, a question identified as having fundamental legal significance due to pending related appeals from other defendants. The decision relies on § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO for the standard of admissibility and §§ 63(1) Sentence 1, 52(1)-(2) GKG for the calculation of the amount in dispute.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1 und 2 GKG; Admission of appeal on points of law regarding temporal extent of compensatory leave for lawful on-call overtime: The dispute centers on the temporal extent of compensatory leave required to offset lawful overtime performed in the form of on-call duty, a question identified as having fundamental legal significance due to pending related appeals from other defendants. The decision relies on § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO for the standard of admissibility and §§ 63(1) Sentence 1, 52(1)-(2) GKG for the calculation of the amount in dispute.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
servizio di picchetto compensazione delle ore straordinarie diritto processuale termini processuali diritto al risarcimento danni decisione incidentale impugnabile

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
The main ground for the admission of the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question regarding compensatory leave for on-call duty overtime.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1 und 2 GKG
The procedural basis for the determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
2 B 116/15, 2 B 116/15 (2 C 24/15)
Compensation for on-call duty overtime performed abroad
2 B 115/15, 2 B 115/15 (2 C 22/15)
Overtime compensation for on-call duty performed abroad
2 B 112/15, 2 B 112/15 (2 C 23/15)
Compensatory leisure time for overseas on-call duty: Admissibility of revision due to fundamental legal significance
2 B 113/15, 2 B 113/15 (2 C 28/16)
Compensation of on-call duty excess work via leisure time: legal treatment of service performed abroad
2 B 53/16
Monetary compensation for uncompensated military overtime and failure to substantiate fundamental significance for leave to appeal

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

The main ground for the admission of the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question regarding compensatory leave for on-call duty overtime.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1 und 2 GKG

The procedural basis for the determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Zeitlicher Umfang von Freizeitausgleich bei rechtmäßiger Mehrarbeit im Bereitschaftsdienst; Revisionszulassung

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision des Klägers ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, in welchem zeitlichen Umfang rechtmäßige Mehrarbeit in Form von Bereitschaftsdienst durch Freizeit auszugleichen ist. Zu dieser Frage sind beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht zwischenzeitlich - nach Zulassung der Revision durch das Oberverwaltungsgericht Münster - von der Beklagten des vorliegenden Verfahrens eingelegte weitere Revisionen anhängig geworden (Verfahren BVerwG 2 C 21.15 bis 2 C 24.15).

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1 und 2 GKG und entspricht der Streitwertfestsetzung des Berufungsgerichts.