Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
4 B 33/15, 4 B 33/15 (4 C 5/15) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2015:151015B4B33.15.0 Generato dall'IA

Point in time for assessing legal situation during litigation when substituting municipal consent for building permit

Numero d'incarto 4 B 33/15, 4 B 33/15 (4 C 5/15)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted the applicant's leave to appeal, finding the complaint well-founded under § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO and setting a provisional amount in dispute of €7,500 for the revision proceedings. The dispute concerns a challenge to a preliminary building permit issued by the competent authority after substituting the municipal consent that was required under § 14(2) Sentence 2 BauGB but refused by the municipality. The court ordered the revision to clarify a significant legal question: the specific point in time that determines the applicable factual and legal situation when the legal landscape changes during the pendency of the administrative litigation, specifically in cases where a municipality contests a permit granted despite its refusal of consent.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 14 Abs. 2 Satz 2 BauGB, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Point in time for assessing legal situation during litigation when substituting municipal consent for building permit: 1 VwGO and setting a provisional amount in dispute of €7,500 for the revision proceedings. The dispute concerns a challenge to a preliminary building permit issued by the competent authority after substituting the municipal consent that was required under § 14(2) Sentence 2 BauGB but refused by the municipality. The court ordered the revision to clarify a significant legal question: the specific point in time that determines the applicable factual and legal situation when the legal landscape changes during the pendency of the administrative litigation, specifically in cases where a municipality contests a permit granted despite its refusal of consent.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
licenza edilizia comunale autorizzazione provvisoria procedura di revisione reclamo amministrativo legittimazione a contestare licenza questione pregiudiziale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for the verdict, justifying the granting of leave to appeal due to the significant legal question regarding the applicable point in time for the factual and legal situation.
§ 14 Abs. 2 Satz 2 BauGB
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
4 C 5/15
Timeliness of review for substituted municipal consent in extending building pre-approval under development control order
4 B 11/16
Admissibility of civil litigation against building permits under § 74 VwGO and the effect of state law abolishing the preliminary objection procedure on statutory limitations
III ZR 29/12
State liability for refusal of building consent where authority may replace unlawfully denied municipal approval
4 C 1/14
Interruption of the municipal consent deadline under § 36 BauGB by suspension of the building permit application under § 15 BauGB
4 B 9.25
Admissibility of review: legal interest in neighbor challenge to building permit despite pending statutory amendment and temporal scope of law for assessment

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for the verdict, justifying the granting of leave to appeal due to the significant legal question regarding the applicable point in time for the factual and legal situation.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Ersetzung des Einvernehmens der Gemeinde; maßgeblicher Zeitpunkt bei Änderung der Rechtslage während des Klageverfahrens

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen, weil das Revisionsverfahren zur Klärung der Frage beitragen kann, auf welchen Zeitpunkt für die Beurteilung der Sach- und Rechtslage maßgeblich abzustellen ist, wenn sich eine Gemeinde gegen die unter Ersetzung des nach § 14 Abs. 2 Satz 2 BauGB erforderlichen, aber verweigerten Einvernehmens erfolgte Erteilung eines Bauvorbescheids wendet und sich im Verlaufe des Klageverfahrens die Rechtslage ändert.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.