Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
3 B 26/14, 3 B 26/14 (3 C 14/15) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2015:060715B3B26.14.0 Generato dall'IA

Conditions for refusing renewal of pharmaceutical license based on unfavorable benefit-risk ratio under German Medicines Act

Numero d'incarto 3 B 26/14, 3 B 26/14 (3 C 14/15)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court granted the complainant's appeal, admitting the revision and finding the case to have fundamental significance, thereby requiring the matter to proceed to the full court for clarification of the legal standards governing the refusal to renew a drug license. The dispute centered on the conditions under which the renewal of a pharmaceutical marketing authorization can be denied specifically due to an unfavorable benefit-risk ratio. The decision rests on the procedural requirement for fundamental significance under Section 132(2)(1) of the Administrative Court Procedure Act, in conjunction with the substantive grounds for refusing renewal under Section 31(3) in conjunction with Section 25(2) Sentence 1 Number 5 of the German Medicines Act.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 GKG, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Conditions for refusing renewal of pharmaceutical license based on unfavorable benefit-risk ratio under German Medicines Act: The dispute centered on the conditions under which the renewal of a pharmaceutical marketing authorization can be denied specifically due to an unfavorable benefit-risk ratio. The decision rests on the procedural requirement for fundamental significance under Section 132(2)(1) of the Administrative Court Procedure Act, in conjunction with the substantive grounds for refusing renewal under Section 31(3) in conjunction with Section 25(2) Sentence 1 Number 5 of the German Medicines Act.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
rinnovo dell'autorizzazione utili e rischi oggetto della lite mancato rinnovo del contratto reclamo amministrativo motivi di revisione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Ground for admitting the revision because the case has fundamental significance.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG
Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Ground for admitting the revision because the case has fundamental significance.

§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG

Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Voraussetzungen für eine Versagung der Verlängerung einer Arzneimittelzulassung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde hat Erfolg. Der Rechtssache kommt die geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) zu. Sie wird dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht voraussichtlich Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen für die Versagung der Verlängerung einer Arzneimittelzulassung nach § 31 Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 25 Abs. 2 Satz 1 Nr. 5 AMG (ungünstiges Nutzen-Risiko-Verhältnis) geben.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.