Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
2 B 81/14, 2 B 81/14 (2 C 3/15) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2015:260115B2B81.14.0 Generato dall'IA

Expiry of sick-leave compensation claim for unused holiday in block-model retirement: 18-month limit despite factual impossibility to exercise entitlement

Numero d'incarto 2 B 81/14, 2 B 81/14 (2 C 3/15)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court granted the defendant’s leave to appeal, permitting the revision proceedings to proceed while preliminarily fixing the amount in dispute, thereby allowing the case to advance to the next instance to resolve the pending legal questions. The dispute concerns whether the right to financial compensation for unused annual leave resulting from sickness during a block-model retirement transition expires eighteen months after the end of the leave year, even if the civil servant was factually unable to exercise their leave entitlement due to illness. The decisive legal basis involves the interpretation of Directive 2003/88/EC, specifically Article 7(1) and Article 7(2), regarding the transferability of rest leave and the conditions under which unused leave claims are forfeited or converted into payment.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Expiry of sick-leave compensation claim for unused holiday in block-model retirement: 18-month limit despite factual impossibility to exercise entitlement: The dispute concerns whether the right to financial compensation for unused annual leave resulting from sickness during a block-model retirement transition expires eighteen months after the end of the leave year, even if the civil servant was factually unable to exercise their leave entitlement due to illness. The decisive legal basis involves the interpretation of Directive 2003/88/EC, specifically Article 7(1) and Article 7(2), regarding the transferability of rest leave and the conditions under which unused leave claims are forfeited or converted into payment.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
congedo di malattia congedo annuo decorrenza del termine condizione di pensionamento indennità di vacanze direttiva sull'orario di lavoro

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground justifying the admission of the revision due to the question's fundamental legal significance.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1 GKG.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Procedural basis for the preliminary fixation of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground justifying the admission of the revision due to the question's fundamental legal significance.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Procedural basis for the preliminary fixation of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Zum Anspruch auf finanzielle Abgeltung krankheitsbedingt nicht in Anspruch genommenen Erholungsurlaubs

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision des Beklagten ist zuzulassen, weil die Rechtssache grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne von § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO hat. Das Revisionsverfahren erscheint geeignet, zur weiteren Klärung der Frage beizutragen, wann der Anspruch auf finanzielle Abgeltung krankheitsbedingt nicht in Anspruch genommenen Erholungsurlaubs aus Art. 7 Abs. 2 der RL 2003/88/EG im Falle einer Altersteilzeit im Blockmodell entsteht und ob der Anspruch auch dann 18 Monate nach dem Ende des Urlaubsjahres erlischt, wenn der Beamte tatsächlich keine Möglichkeit hatte, den ihm mit Art. 7 Abs. 1 der RL 2003/88/EG verliehenen Anspruch auszuüben (vgl. EuGH, Urteil vom 22. November 2011 - Rs C-214/10, KHS - Slg. 2011, I-11757 Rn. 41).

Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1 GKG.