Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvR 671/26 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2026:rk20260427.2bvr067126 Generato dall'IA

Denial of interim relief in constitutional complaint for failure to substantiate potential fundamental rights violation under BVerfGG

Numero d'incarto 2 BvR 671/26
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court (Second Senate, First Chamber) dismissed the applicant’s request for a provisional order (einstweilige Anordnung) in a constitutional complaint proceeding, with the decision being final and unappealable. The case involved a complaint where the applicant failed to substantiate that the underlying constitutional complaint was neither inadmissible nor manifestly unfounded, specifically lacking a demonstration of a possible violation of the identified fundamental rights. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was the failure to meet the substantive disclosure requirements of § 23 para. 1 sentence 2 and § 92 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), which mandate a specific showing of the potential for a rights violation to justify interim relief.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 23 Absatz 1 Satz 2 BVerfGG, § 92 BVerfGG; Denial of interim relief in constitutional complaint for failure to substantiate potential fundamental rights violation under BVerfGG: The case involved a complaint where the applicant failed to substantiate that the underlying constitutional complaint was neither inadmissible nor manifestly unfounded, specifically lacking a demonstration of a possible violation of the identified fundamental rights. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was the failure to meet the substantive disclosure requirements of § 23 para. 1 sentence 2 and § 92 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), which mandate a specific showing of the potential for a rights violation to justify interim relief.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
procedimento sommario motivazione inadeguata delle censure costituzionali diritti fondamentali procedimento pregiudiziale d'urgenza soccorso d'emergenza costituzionale carenza dei requisiti materiali

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 23 Absatz 1 Satz 2 BVerfGG
Cited as the procedural requirement for the substantive justification of a constitutional complaint, which the applicant failed to meet.
§ 92 BVerfGG
Cited as the procedural standard requiring the applicant to demonstrate a possible violation of fundamental rights to justify the interim order.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BVerfGE 99, 84
BVerfGE 99, 84 m.w.N.;BVerfG, Beschluss der 2.
Generato dall'IA
2 BvR 87/17
Denial of interim relief in constitutional complaint due to insufficient substantiation of fundamental rights violations and failure to engage with the challenged judgment
1 BvQ 66/17
Denial of interim relief due to manifest lack of substantiation of constitutional complaint
1 BvQ 14/15
Interim relief for constitutional complaint rejected due to failure to meet § 23 BVerfGG substantiation requirements
1 BvQ 61/19
Interim relief denied where pending constitutional complaint lacks exhausted remedies and substantive reasoning
2 BvQ 101/18
Constitutional interim relief denied for failure to substantiate the principle of subsidiarity of constitutional complaints

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 23 Absatz 1 Satz 2 BVerfGG

Cited as the procedural requirement for the substantive justification of a constitutional complaint, which the applicant failed to meet.

§ 92 BVerfGG

Cited as the procedural standard requiring the applicant to demonstrate a possible violation of fundamental rights to justify the interim order.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Erfolgloser Eilantrag im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren: Unzureichende Darlegung der Möglichkeit einer Grundrechtsverletzung

[TENOR]

Der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung wird abgelehnt.

Der Beschwerdeführer hat nicht substantiiert dargelegt, dass die Verfassungsbeschwerde nach derzeitigem Stand weder von vornherein unzulässig noch offensichtlich unbegründet ist (vgl. BVerfGE 99, 84 m.w.N.;BVerfG, Beschluss der 2. Kammer des Ersten Senats vom 20. August 2015 - 1 BvQ 28/15 -, Rn. 2; Beschluss der 2. Kammer des Zweiten Senats vom 30. September 2015 - 2 BvQ 29/15 -, Rn. 2; stRspr). Er hat die Möglichkeit einer Verletzung der von ihm bezeichneten Grundrechte nicht in einer den Anforderungen der § 23 Absatz 1 Satz 2, § 92 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz entsprechenden Weise aufgezeigt.

[GRUENDE]

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.