Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
2 BvC 30/23 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2025:cs20250113.2bvc003023 Generato dall'IA

Constitutional validity of Federal Electoral Law amendment regarding election review procedure

Numero d'incarto 2 BvC 30/23
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court (BVerfG) declared the election review complaint partially moot regarding the constitutional validity of Article 1 No. 3 of the 25th Amendment to the Federal Electoral Law of November 14, 2020, and rejected the remainder of the complaint as inadmissible. The dispute concerned a challenge to specific amendments to the Federal Electoral Law, where the court determined that the initial legal objection had been rendered obsolete, while the remaining claims lacked merit. The decision relied on § 24 Sentence 2 BVerfGG, which permitted the court to forgo a separate written justification by referring to the reasoning outlined in the reporting judge’s letter dated November 14, 2024, resulting in a final dismissal of the ineffective portions of the petition.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG; Constitutional validity of Federal Electoral Law amendment regarding election review procedure: 3 of the 25th Amendment to the Federal Electoral Law of November 14, 2020, and rejected the remainder of the complaint as inadmissible. The dispute concerned a challenge to specific amendments to the Federal Electoral Law, where the court determined that the initial legal objection had been rendered obsolete, while the remaining claims lacked merit. The decision relied on § 24 Sentence 2 BVerfGG, which permitted the court to forgo a separate written justification by referring to the reasoning outlined in the reporting judge’s letter dated November 14, 2024, resulting in a final dismissal of the ineffective portions of the petition.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
validità delle elezioni diritto elettorale modificazione delle conclusioni motivazione inadeguata delle censure costituzionali revisione della costituzione costituzionalità delle leggi

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG

Procedural provision cited to justify the court's decision to forgo a detailed written justification by referring to the reporting judge's letter.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Feststellung der teilweisen Erledigung einer Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde, iÜ Verwerfung (a-limine-Abweisung) unter Hinweis auf das Berichterstatterschreiben

[TENOR]

1. Die Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde hat sich erledigt, soweit der Beschwerdeführer die Vereinbarkeit von Artikel 1 Nummer 3 des Fünfundzwanzigsten Gesetzes zur Änderung des Bundeswahlgesetzes vom 14. November 2020 (Bundesgesetzblatt I Seite 2395) mit dem Grundgesetz beanstandet.

2. Im Übrigen wird die Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde verworfen.

[GRUENDE]

1. Die Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde hat sich aus den in dem Schreiben der Berichterstatterin vom 14. November 2024 genannten Gründen teilweise erledigt. Gemäß § 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG wird von einer weiteren Begründung abgesehen.

2. Im Übrigen bleibt der Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde aus den in dem Schreiben der Berichterstatterin vom 14. November 2024 genannten Gründen der Erfolg versagt. Gemäß § 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG wird von einer weiteren Begründung abgesehen.