Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvE 1/24 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2024:es20240221.2bve000124 Generato dall'IA

Interim relief admissibility for Bundestag membership rights in Parliamentary Intelligence Control Committee

Numero d'incarto 2 BvE 1/24
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court rejected the applicant's application for interim relief, ruling the request inadmissible due to insufficient substantiation. A member of the German Bundestag challenged his exclusion from the Parliamentary Control Committee for intelligence agencies, disputing the interpretation of § 2(4) of the relevant control act. The Court determined that the applicant failed to adequately demonstrate that the membership constituted a right flowing from his status as a legislator under Article 38(1) of the Basic Law, thereby not meeting the initial requirements for interim relief under § 32 in conjunction with § 23(1) sentence 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 32 Absatz 1 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz, § 23 Absatz 1 Satz 2 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz; Interim relief admissibility for Bundestag membership rights in Parliamentary Intelligence Control Committee: A member of the German Bundestag challenged his exclusion from the Parliamentary Control Committee for intelligence agencies, disputing the interpretation of § 2(4) of the relevant control act. The Court determined that the applicant failed to adequately demonstrate that the membership constituted a right flowing from his status as a legislator under Article 38(1) of the Basic Law, thereby not meeting the initial requirements for interim relief under § 32 in conjunction with § 23(1) sentence 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
diritto parlamentare procedimento sommario diritto all'affiliazione tutela legale diritto di manifestare requisito costituzionale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 32 Absatz 1 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz
Cited in the dispositive as the procedural basis under which the application for interim relief was rejected.
§ 23 Absatz 1 Satz 2 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz
Cited in the dispositive to establish the substantive disclosure requirement that the applicant failed to meet, rendering the application inadmissible.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BVerfGE 160, 191
BVerfGE 160, 191 - 2G+-Regel bei Gedenkstunde des Deutschen Bundestages - eA).
BVerfGE 160, 368
hierzu nur BVerfGE 160, 368 m.w.N.
Generato dall'IA
2 BvE 10/21
Interim relief denied in inter-institutional dispute over majoritarian election of Bundestag committee chairs versus factional entitlement under Art. 38 GG
2 BvE 1/20
Interim relief for reinstated committee chair in organ dispute: balancing effective opposition rights against parliamentary self-determination
2 BvE 2/20
Interim relief in institutional dispute: refusal to admit individual MP's candidate nomination for Vice-President of the Bundestag
2 BvQ 59/19
Interim injunction against enactment of statutes: quorum defect in parliamentary vote and the admissibility of preventive constitutional review
1 BvQ 147/20
Interim relief against assembly ban: sufficiency of substantiation under § 32(1) BVerfGG

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 32 Absatz 1 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz

Cited in the dispositive as the procedural basis under which the application for interim relief was rejected.

§ 23 Absatz 1 Satz 2 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz

Cited in the dispositive to establish the substantive disclosure requirement that the applicant failed to meet, rendering the application inadmissible.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Erfolgloser Eilantrag eines Bundestagsabgeordneten bzgl seiner Mitgliedschaft im Parlamentarischen Kontrollgremium - Tenorbegründung

[TENOR]

Der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung wird verworfen. Er ist unzulässig, weil die Voraussetzungen des § 32 Absatz 1 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz nicht in einer den Anforderungen des § 23 Absatz 1 Satz 2 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz genügenden Weise dargelegt sind. Es ist nicht hinreichend dargetan, dass der Antrag in der Hauptsache weder von vornherein unzulässig noch offensichtlich unbegründet wäre (vgl. BVerfGE 160, 191 - 2G+-Regel bei Gedenkstunde des Deutschen Bundestages - eA). Der Antragsteller zeigt die behauptete Rechtsverletzung unter Beachtung der vom Bundesverfassungsgericht entwickelten Maßstäbe nicht substantiiert auf.

Er legt lediglich die Meinungsverschiedenheiten zwischen ihm und den Antragsgegnern in Bezug auf die Auslegung des § 2 Absatz 4 Gesetz über die parlamentarische Kontrolle nachrichtendienstlicher Tätigkeit des Bundes dar. Hingegen fehlt es an Ausführungen dazu, ob und inwieweit seine Mitgliedschaft in dem Parlamentarischen Kontrollgremium Teil derjenigen Rechte ist, die aus seinem durch Artikel 38 Absatz 1 Grundgesetz gewährleisteten Abgeordnetenstatus fließen (vgl. hierzu nur BVerfGE 160, 368 m.w.N. - Wahl eines Vizepräsidenten des Bundestages).