Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvR 637/23 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2023:rk20231107.2bvr063723 Generato dall'IA

Interim suspension of involuntary detention order; renewal of preliminary injunction for irreversibility of commitment

Numero d'incarto 2 BvR 637/23
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court (BVerfG) ordered the repetition of its preliminary injunction dated May 19, 2023, suspending the execution of a judicial detention order for a further period of six months or until a decision on the merits of the constitutional complaint, with the complainant prevailing in securing continued liberty. The dispute arose from a constitutional complaint challenging a detention order issued by a district court for involuntary commitment or detention under the criminal procedure code, which the applicants argued violated their fundamental rights. The court held that the statutory prerequisites for issuing a preliminary injunction remained met because the constitutional complaint was not manifestly inadmissible or unfounded, and the consequences of executing the detention would be irreversible, justifying the continuation of the stay under the principle that a prior injunction may be renewed if the legal and factual situation has not changed, citing § 32(6) Sentence 2 BVerfGG and § 81(1) StPO.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 81 Abs 1 StPO, § 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 BVerfGG; Interim suspension of involuntary detention order; renewal of preliminary injunction for irreversibility of commitment: The dispute arose from a constitutional complaint challenging a detention order issued by a district court for involuntary commitment or detention under the criminal procedure code, which the applicants argued violated their fundamental rights. The court held that the statutory prerequisites for issuing a preliminary injunction remained met because the constitutional complaint was not manifestly inadmissible or unfounded, and the consequences of executing the detention would be irreversible, justifying the continuation of the stay under the principle that a prior injunction may be renewed if the legal and factual situation has not changed, citing § 32(6) Sentence 2 BVerfGG and § 81(1) StPO.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
proroga della carcerazione sospensione di pena termine di sospensione decisione pregiudiziale diritto di rimanere codice di procedura penale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 81 Abs 1 StPO
Wiederholung einer einstweiligen Anordnung: Einstweilige Aussetzung eines Unterbringungsbeschlusses gem § 81 Abs 1 StPO
§ 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 BVerfGG
Procedural basis cited in the operative order to authorize the repetition of the prior interim injunction.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BVerfGE 21, 50
BVerfGE 21, 50; 89, 113 ; 97, 102 ; BVerfG, Beschluss des Zweiten Senats vom 20.
2 BvR 900/22
Suspended pretrial detention in re-prosecution under § 362 Nr. 5 StPO: balancing ne bis in idem and personal liberty against flight risk
2 BvR 1845/18
Interim suspension of extradition to Romania pending constitutional review; validity of interim order issued without reasoned grounds under BVerfGG
2 BvR 1514/21
Interim relief suspending appellate deadlines and oral hearing after denial of legal aid for excessive proof of need
Generato dall'IA
2 BvR 2061/19
Repetition of interim suspension of custodial sentence execution during pending constitutional review
2 BvR 852/20
Repetition of interim injunction suspending enforcement of foreign criminal sentence under § 32 Abs. 6 BVerfGG
2 BvR 829/24
Repetition of interim order suspending execution of custodial sentence pending constitutional complaint

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 BVerfGG

Procedural basis cited in the operative order to authorize the repetition of the prior interim injunction.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Wiederholung einer einstweiligen Anordnung: Einstweilige Aussetzung eines Unterbringungsbeschlusses gem § 81 Abs 1 StPO

[TENOR]

Die einstweilige Anordnung vom 19. Mai 2023 wird bis zu einer Entscheidung über die Verfassungsbeschwerde, längstens für die Dauer von sechs Monaten, wiederholt (§ 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 BVerfGG).

[GRUENDE]

I. Die 2. Kammer des Zweiten Senats des Bundesverfassungsgerichts hat durch einstweilige Anordnung vom 19. Mai 2023 den Vollzug des Beschlusses des Amtsgerichts Augsburg vom 27. März 2023 - 04 Cs 210 Js 141387/20 - ausgesetzt. Zur Begründung hat die Kammer ausgeführt, die Verfassungsbeschwerde sei weder von vornherein unzulässig noch unbegründet und die Folgenabwägung spreche für den Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung, da es im Falle des Vollzugs zu einem Eingriff komme, dessen Wirkungen nicht rückgängig gemacht werden könnten.

II. Das Bundesverfassungsgericht kann eine einstweilige Anordnung dann wiederholen, wenn die gesetzlichen Voraussetzungen für den erstmaligen Erlass einer solchen Anordnung noch gegeben sind (vgl. BVerfGE 21, 50; 89, 113 ; 97, 102 ; BVerfG, Beschluss des Zweiten Senats vom 20. Dezember 2022 - 2 BvR 900/22 -, Rn. 2; Beschluss der 2. Kammer des Zweiten Senats vom 26. September 2019 - 2 BvR 1845/18 -, Rn. 2; Beschluss der 1. Kammer des Zweiten Senats vom 22. Februar 2022 - 2 BvR 1514/21 -, Rn. 2).

Dies ist vorliegend der Fall. Zur Begründung wird auf den Beschluss der Kammer vom 19. Mai 2023 verwiesen. Die Sach- und Rechtslage hat sich seither nicht geändert.