Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvR 1260/23 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2023:rk20230905.2bvr126023 Generato dall'IA

Constitutional complaint against civil hearing conducted via video conference under § 128a ZPO: failure to substantiate fundamental rights infringement

Numero d'incarto 2 BvR 1260/23
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the request for an interim injunction, leaving the lower court proceedings unaffected. The dispute arose in constitutional complaint proceedings where the complainant challenged a civil court order to hold the hearing via video and audio conference under § 128a of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), alleging a violation of fundamental rights. The Court rejected the application because the complainant failed to substantively demonstrate a plausible infringement of basic rights specifically attributable to the conduct of the hearing through remote transmission, thereby failing to meet the threshold requirements for granting interim relief in this procedural context.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 128a ZPO; Constitutional complaint against civil hearing conducted via video conference under § 128a ZPO: failure to substantiate fundamental rights infringement: The dispute arose in constitutional complaint proceedings where the complainant challenged a civil court order to hold the hearing via video and audio conference under § 128a of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), alleging a violation of fundamental rights. The Court rejected the application because the complainant failed to substantively demonstrate a plausible infringement of basic rights specifically attributable to the conduct of the hearing through remote transmission, thereby failing to meet the threshold requirements for granting interim relief in this procedural context.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
diritto di essere sentito direzione del processo causa civile requisito costituzionale procedura di infrazione diritti fondamentali

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 128a ZPO
Erfolgloser Eilantrag im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren: Grundrechtsverletzung in Zusammenhang mit § 128a ZPO (Verhandlung im Wege der Bild- und Tonübertragung) bislang nicht nachvollziehbar dargelegt
Generato dall'IA
2 BvR 1054/19
Constitutional complaint: denial of oral hearing under § 495a ZPO and failure to demonstrate causal link between right-to-be-heard violation and loss of declaratory interest
1 BvR 367/15
Mandatory oral hearing under § 495a ZPO upon party request and violation of constitutional right to be heard
2 BvR 1907/18
Constitutional right to be heard violated by ignoring statutory request for oral hearing in written proceedings under § 495a(2) ZPO
2 BvR 1552/14
Admissibility of constitutional complaint against civil cost order for failure to file hearing objection despite violation of right to be heard
1 BvR 2884/18
Failure to Notify Parties of Written Procedure Under § 495a ZPO Violates Right to Be Heard

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Erfolgloser Eilantrag im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren: Grundrechtsverletzung in Zusammenhang mit § 128a ZPO (Verhandlung im Wege der Bild- und Tonübertragung) bislang nicht nachvollziehbar dargelegt

[TENOR]

Der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung wird abgelehnt.