Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvR 1851/22 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2023:rk20230620.2bvr185122 Generato dall'IA

Interim repetition of enforcement suspension pending refusal to submit sworn statement for debt enforcement

Numero d'incarto 2 BvR 1851/22
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The German Federal Constitutional Court repeated its prior interim order, extending the suspension of enforcement proceedings for a further three months pending a decision on the constitutional complaint. The dispute concerned a debtor who refused to submit a sworn statement (eidesstattliche Versicherung) required for debt enforcement, despite a final judgment from a regional court, leading the creditor to seek compulsion. The Court held that the initial conditions for interim relief remained unchanged and that the continued delay was proportionate given the court's intent to resolve the main issue promptly, thereby siding with the complainant. The decision is grounded in § 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 BVerfGG and the established doctrine that interim orders may be repeated if the statutory prerequisites for their initial issuance persist, specifically balancing the creditor's interest in enforcement against the debtor's fundamental rights.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 BVerfGG; Interim repetition of enforcement suspension pending refusal to submit sworn statement for debt enforcement: The dispute concerned a debtor who refused to submit a sworn statement (eidesstattliche Versicherung) required for debt enforcement, despite a final judgment from a regional court, leading the creditor to seek compulsion. The Court held that the initial conditions for interim relief remained unchanged and that the continued delay was proportionate given the court's intent to resolve the main issue promptly, thereby siding with the complainant. The decision is grounded in § 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 BVerfGG and the established doctrine that interim orders may be repeated if the statutory prerequisites for their initial issuance persist, specifically balancing the creditor's interest in enforcement against the debtor's fundamental rights.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
esecuzione per debiti procedimento sommario procedura pendente esecuzione della sentenza sospensione della procedura di fallimento diritto di rimanere

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 BVerfGG
Procedural basis cited in the dispositive for repeating the interim order for a further period pending the decision on the constitutional complaint.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BVerfGE 21, 50
BVerfGE 21, 50; 89, 113 ; 97, 102 ; BVerfG, Beschluss der 2.
2 BvR 1845/18
Interim suspension of extradition to Romania pending constitutional review; validity of interim order issued without reasoned grounds under BVerfGG
2 BvR 1514/21
Interim relief suspending appellate deadlines and oral hearing after denial of legal aid for excessive proof of need
Generato dall'IA
XI ZR 4/26
Interim suspension of enforcement of notarial guarantee: insufficiency of consumer’s hardship and lack of prospects of success on public policy challenge
1 BvR 2616/13
Suspension of administrative enforcement for irreparable credit damage despite statutory immediate executability
2 BvR 2061/19
Interim injunction repetition: suspension of custodial sentence execution pending constitutional complaint
2 BvR 1514/21
Repetition of constitutional interim order suspending civil court deadlines and oral hearing
2 BvQ 6/23
Rejection of isolated interim relief for manifestly inadmissible constitutional complaints and imposition of abuse fee for repeated frivolous filings

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 BVerfGG

Procedural basis cited in the dispositive for repeating the interim order for a further period pending the decision on the constitutional complaint.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Wiederholung einer einstweiligen Anordnung: Einstweilige Aussetzung der Zwangsvollstreckung nach Ablehnung der Änderung einer eidesstattlichen Versicherung

[TENOR]

Die einstweilige Anordnung vom 4. Januar 2023 wird bis zu einer Entscheidung über die Verfassungsbeschwerde, längstens für die Dauer von drei Monaten, wiederholt (§ 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 BVerfGG).

[GRUENDE]

I. Das Bundesverfassungsgericht hat durch einstweilige Anordnung vom 4. Januar 2023 die Zwangsvollstreckung aus dem Schlussurteil des Landgerichts Düsseldorf vom 27. Januar 2020 - 5 O 390/16 - einstweilen bis zur Entscheidung über die Verfassungsbeschwerde, längstens für die Dauer von sechs Monaten, ausgesetzt.

II. Das Bundesverfassungsgericht kann eine einstweilige Anordnung dann wiederholen, wenn die gesetzlichen Voraussetzungen für den erstmaligen Erlass einer solchen Anordnung noch gegeben sind (vgl. BVerfGE 21, 50; 89, 113 ; 97, 102 ; BVerfG, Beschluss der 2. Kammer des Zweiten Senats vom 26. September 2019 - 2 BvR 1845/18 -, Rn. 2; Beschluss der 1. Kammer des Zweiten Senats vom 22. Februar 2022 - 2 BvR 1514/21 -, Rn. 2).

Dies ist vorliegend der Fall. Zur Begründung wird auf den Beschluss vom 4. Januar 2023 verwiesen. Die Sach- und Rechtslage hat sich seither nicht geändert. Unter Berücksichtigung des Umstandes, dass das Bundesverfassungsgericht bemüht sein wird, die Hauptsache alsbald zu entscheiden, ist eine Wiederholung der einstweiligen Anordnung für weitere drei Monate und die damit einhergehende Verzögerung der zwangsweisen Durchsetzung der abzugebenden eidesstattlichen Versicherung gegenüber dem Vollstreckungsgläubiger noch verhältnismäßig.